Bug#567706: Logic of 3.5.8+CVS.2010.02.14-0.2

2010-03-04 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 09:42:33PM +, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > I don't know any reason not to keep the dependencies on old emacs > versions; there is a large amount of upstream code to support them. Well, a reason is that we generally support only one release at a time, and that in the ne

Bug#567706: Logic of 3.5.8+CVS.2010.02.14-0.2

2010-03-04 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
> It "depends" (pun, sorry). Do you want to explicitly *keep* the > dependency on old emacs? If yes, I agree that my NMU can simply be I don't know any reason not to keep the dependencies on old emacs versions; there is a large amount of upstream code to support them.

Bug#567706: Logic of 3.5.8+CVS.2010.02.14-0.2

2010-03-04 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 04:01:14PM +, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > I think bug 567706 is fixed with simply > > Depends: ... emacs23 | emacsOLD | ... > > which was in 3.5.8+CVS.2010.02.14-0.1 > > Am I misunderstanding something? It "depends" (pun, sorry). Do you want to explicitly *keep*

Bug#567706: Logic of 3.5.8+CVS.2010.02.14-0.2

2010-03-04 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
I think bug 567706 is fixed with simply Depends: ... emacs23 | emacsOLD | ... which was in 3.5.8+CVS.2010.02.14-0.1 Am I misunderstanding something? --Barak. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "un