reassign 519006 binutils
tag 519006 + patch
forwarded 519006 http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-09/msg00216.html
thanks
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 05:27:04PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I have done a rebuilt of part of the archive using gcc-4.4 that defaults
> to -mplt. Unfortunately I don't h
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:44:25PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have made some progress on this bug, though it has not progress in the
> expected direction. In other words I got some surprises.
>
> First of all it the bug has been introduced in binutils when introducing
> the MIPS
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> Hi all,
Hi,
>
> I have made some progress on this bug, though it has not progress in the
> expected direction. In other words I got some surprises.
>
> First of all it the bug has been introduced in binutils when introducing
> the MIPS PLT support [1] (commits around 200
Hi all,
I have made some progress on this bug, though it has not progress in the
expected direction. In other words I got some surprises.
First of all it the bug has been introduced in binutils when introducing
the MIPS PLT support [1] (commits around 2008-08-08). I am still
convinced it is actua
reassign 519006 gcc-4.4
found 519006 4.4.2-8
thanks
This bug is actually a GCC bug, present in 4.4 and fixed in 4.5. The
patch that fixes the problem is available [1], but is not easily
backportable without good GCC knowledge.
A workaround to this bug is to not compile with -g.
[1] http://gcc.gn
Hi,
while fixing #531937 I found out how to create a very minimalistic
testcase. Apparently the diagnosis that ld cannot “override” libc
symbols with local symbols was correct.
I have created an attachment to the upstream-filed bug at:
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
I e
6 matches
Mail list logo
