On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Dustin Kirkland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 21:50 -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
>> I will see what I can do, but I'm not the gatekeeper for whether or
>> not it will actually make it in; lsb-base is already frozen, so the
>> decision is above m
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 21:50 -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> I will see what I can do, but I'm not the gatekeeper for whether or
> not it will actually make it in; lsb-base is already frozen, so the
> decision is above my pay grade.
Just to clarify, I'm looking for this to make it into 'unstable'.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Dustin Kirkland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have attached an updated patch for the status_of_proc() function, that
> we're currently carrying in Ubuntu.
>
> I have replaced the call to pidofproc() with an invocation
> of /bin/pidof.
>
> It seems that pidofproc() w
Chris-
I have attached an updated patch for the status_of_proc() function, that
we're currently carrying in Ubuntu.
I have replaced the call to pidofproc() with an invocation
of /bin/pidof.
It seems that pidofproc() will attempt to call "kill -0" on a pid, if a
pidfile is found. This "kill" ope
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 21:16 -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> Thanks, Dustin. I'm holding off on integrating these patches until I
> get 3.2-12 into testing; adding functionality would break the spirit
> of the freeze, but I'll plan on getting status_of_proc() into unstable
> soon after that migratio
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Dustin Kirkland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another minor update to this patch, also in the vein of making it "set
> -e" safe.
>
> These changes have been integrated into Ubuntu Intrepid. We thought you
> might integrate them into Debian Unstable as well.
Thanks,
Another minor update to this patch, also in the vein of making it "set
-e" safe.
These changes have been integrated into Ubuntu Intrepid. We thought you
might integrate them into Debian Unstable as well.
:-Dustin
--- lsb.unstable/lsb-3.2/init-functions 2008-05-01 10:07:37.0 -0500
+++ ls
I have update the patch for this bug with two changes.
The first makes killproc more "set -e" safe, by:
+/bin/pidof -o %PPID $1 || status="$?"
The second quotes "$status" and uses shell string comparisons rather
than numerical comparisons. Surveying the rest of the init-functions
scrip
Package: lsb-base
Version: 3.2-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
The Linux Standard Base init script specification:
http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/iniscrptact.html
describes the status action in detail. In brief, it provides a
centralized and direct w
9 matches
Mail list logo
