Bug#467338: [Fwd: Re: Bug#467338: proposal for counterpart of gpgsigs]

2008-03-05 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 14:50, Philippe Teuwen wrote: > > I think this would be very suitable to include. I have one question > > though: it's currently licenced GPLv3. There are already two different > > licences for the scripts in signing-party: GPLv2+ and BSD. To keep things > > simple I w

Bug#467338: [Fwd: Re: Bug#467338: proposal for counterpart of gpgsigs]

2008-02-27 Thread Philippe Teuwen
Hi Thijs, > I think this would be very suitable to include. I have one question though: > it's currently licenced GPLv3. There are already two different licences for > the scripts in signing-party: GPLv2+ and BSD. To keep things simple I would > very much prefer not to add a third one to that.

Bug#467338: proposal for counterpart of gpgsigs

2008-02-27 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi Philippe, On Sunday 24 February 2008 19:54, Philippe Teuwen wrote: > I was wondering how to generate the signing-party list used in > /usr/share/doc/signing-party/gpgsigs/examples/ or at FOSDEM2008 > and as I needed to generate one I simply wrote my own script. > Here it is for info, feel free

Bug#467338: proposal for counterpart of gpgsigs

2008-02-24 Thread Philippe Teuwen
Package: signing-party Version: 0.4.13-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch --- Please enter the report below this line. --- I was wondering how to generate the signing-party list used in /usr/share/doc/signing-party/gpgsigs/examples/ or at FOSDEM2008 and as I needed to generate one I simply wrote my