Hi Thijs, > I think this would be very suitable to include. I have one question though: > it's currently licenced GPLv3. There are already two different licences for > the scripts in signing-party: GPLv2+ and BSD. To keep things simple I would > very much prefer not to add a third one to that. So my question to you is: > would you agree to relicence under either GPLv2+ or BSD? If not there's no > real problem of course. > No prob, by this mail I relicense it as GPLv2 or newer. (I won't copy again the full script here...)
Phil -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
