Bernard Jungen a écrit :
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 12:10:21AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> reassign 441138 xsensors
>> thanks
>
>> [...]
>
>> Given that the alarm flag is computed by the it87 chip itself, xsensors
>> is wrong there. Reassigning the bug.
>
> Oh, actually xsensors works fine wi
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 12:10:21AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> reassign 441138 xsensors
> thanks
> [...]
> Given that the alarm flag is computed by the it87 chip itself, xsensors
> is wrong there. Reassigning the bug.
Oh, actually xsensors works fine with the default config. The first config
reassign 441138 xsensors
thanks
Bernard Jungen a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 08:17:53AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Could you please give me an example with the values?
>
> Config that works for xsensors but not sensord:
> set in5_max -12 * 0.9
> set in5_min -12 * 1.1
> set
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 08:17:53AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Could you please give me an example with the values?
Config that works for xsensors but not sensord:
set in5_max -12 * 0.9
set in5_min -12 * 1.1
set in6_max -5 * 0.9
set in6_min -5 * 1.1
Log:
sensord: Sensor alarm:
Bernard Jungen a écrit :
> Package: sensord
> Version: 1:2.10.4-1
> Severity: Important
>
> Min-max limits meaning seems to be inverted here when negative (voltage)
> values are involved, continuously setting off the alarm! Swapping the min-max
> values in the config file fixes the problem, but th
Package: sensord
Version: 1:2.10.4-1
Severity: Important
Min-max limits meaning seems to be inverted here when negative (voltage)
values are involved, continuously setting off the alarm! Swapping the min-max
values in the config file fixes the problem, but then it's xsensors that
gets the limits w
6 matches
Mail list logo
