Bernard Jungen a écrit : > On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 12:10:21AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> reassign 441138 xsensors >> thanks > >> [...] > >> Given that the alarm flag is computed by the it87 chip itself, xsensors >> is wrong there. Reassigning the bug. > > Oh, actually xsensors works fine with the default config. The first config > above that doesn't work is the default one from the package. The alarm should > NOT be set off in that case! Maybe it's the it87 chip that's somehow > programmed wrong then? > > If min/max values must be swapped then min/max have also a special meaning > for negative values, contrary to what seems to be assumed for other chips > in the config file.
Actually that depends of the formula you uses for negative values. The chip compute the alarm flag using the raw values. If the raw value is just shifted into negative numbers, there is no need to swap min/max values. If the raw value is inverted then the min/max values have to be swap. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
