On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:02:38AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> updated. The bad version still lives in lenny though, so I wonder
> what will happen if libc6 migrates to lenny before lib32z1. Also, on
That at least is unlikely - the only thing holding zlib out of testing
is glibc and manual ap
reassign 432491 lib32z
forcemerge 432491 432330
thanks
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:22:11AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.6-1
> Severity: serious
>
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-i386_2.6-1_amd64.deb
> (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/usr/
also sprach Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.10.1043 +0200]:
> not a libc problem.
Well, my bad for not checking lib32z1, but the important point is
that I dist-upgraded within sid and libc6 failed to install, not
lib32z1. Thus, since lib32z1 was "first", it's libc6's job to work
around
Package: libc6
Version: 2.6-1
Severity: serious
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-i386_2.6-1_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib32', which is also in package lib32z1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'u
4 matches
Mail list logo