also sprach Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.10.1043 +0200]: > not a libc problem.
Well, my bad for not checking lib32z1, but the important point is that I dist-upgraded within sid and libc6 failed to install, not lib32z1. Thus, since lib32z1 was "first", it's libc6's job to work around it e.g. by conflicting with the "bad" lib32z1 versions. But I guess we can just look over this now since lib32z1 has also been updated. The bad version still lives in lenny though, so I wonder what will happen if libc6 migrates to lenny before lib32z1. Also, on pure lenny systems, they will run into exactly the same conflict if they try to do a dist-upgrade, which includes both, lib32z1 and libc6 2.6. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
