Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 11:28:43PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
>> But this screws up usability of Debian as a whole if half of the
>> packages cannot be installed because another half is compiled with a
>> library that conflicts with former.
>
> In this case we're talking abou
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 11:28:43PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 08:25:05PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> >> AFAIK, library packages cannot conflict with each other.
> > Sure they can...
> But this screws up usability of Debian as a whole if half of the
> packages cannot be i
Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 401388 important
> thanks
I'd knew you were going to do that! :)
>
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 08:25:05PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
>
>> AFAIK, library packages cannot conflict with each other.
>
> Sure they can...
But this screws up usability of Debian as a whol
severity 401388 important
thanks
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 08:25:05PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> AFAIK, library packages cannot conflict with each other.
Sure they can...
> What should change is that libneon26-gnutls should provide a file with
> an alternate soname and an alternate filename. As p
Package: neon26
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.5, 8.1
Currently ANY package compiled with libneon26-gnutls cannot be
installed if ANY package exists on the system that is compiled with
libneon26. AFAIK, library packages cannot conflict with each
other.
What should change is that libne
5 matches
Mail list logo