On 16 March 2006 at 08:46, Diethelm Wuertz wrote:
| Dear all,
|
| I took some time to look at the code, but I not really know what to do.
| The Fortran
| program concerns the SQP algorithm written not by myself but with extension
| added by me. I had also some problems to run it for the Mac and
Dear all,
I took some time to look at the code, but I not really know what to do.
The Fortran
program concerns the SQP algorithm written not by myself but with extension
added by me. I had also some problems to run it for the Mac and under
Windows with the Mingw gfortran/gf77 compilers but I th
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:37:08PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Thanks for confirming, and of course your upload. We'll go with this now
> tested and confirmed debian/rules as per the next revision; I'll mark the
> bug pending. Ok?
Works for me.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun,
| On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:47:13AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > Ok, I tested the debian/rules and it works. One thing I have figured out is
| > how to pass more than one argument to FFLAGS which seems to fail -- I am
| > probably running into some issues with quoting.
|
| This one w
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:47:13AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Ok, I tested the debian/rules and it works. One thing I have figured out is
> how to pass more than one argument to FFLAGS which seems to fail -- I am
> probably running into some issues with quoting.
This one works fine.
--
Ok, I tested the debian/rules and it works. One thing I have figured out is
how to pass more than one argument to FFLAGS which seems to fail -- I am
probably running into some issues with quoting.
Dirk
#!/usr/bin/make -f
# -*- makefile -*-
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 08:23:34AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> so you could try the 'if m68k' line in debian/rules to start as
> MAKEFLAGS="CFLAGS=-O1" R CMD INSTALL
> where is everything we currently have behind INSTALL.
If you mean:
| MAKEFLAGS="CFLAGS=-O1" R CMD INSTALL
On 13 March 2006 at 09:02, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
| On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 08:23:34AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > so you could try the 'if m68k' line in debian/rules to start as
| > MAKEFLAGS="CFLAGS=-O1" R CMD INSTALL
| > where is everything we currently have behind I
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:16:22PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Try this, please:
Ends up with the following command line, which fails.
| g77 -w -O0 -fPIC -g -O2 -c 034B-GarchModelling.f -o 034B-GarchModelling.o
BTW: I'm uploading the package I built with 034B-GarchModelling.f
compiled
On 13 March 2006 at 07:50, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
| On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:16:22PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > Try this, please:
|
| Ends up with the following command line, which fails.
|
| | g77 -w -O0 -fPIC -g -O2 -c 034B-GarchModelling.f -o 034B-GarchModelling.o
I was
Try this, please:
-
#!/usr/bin/make -f
# -*- makefile -*-
# debian/rules file for the Debian/GNU Linux r-cran-fseries package
# Copyright 2003-2006 by Dirk Eddelbuette
On 11 March 2006 at 21:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| (Diethelm and Brian trimmed)
|
| On 11 March 2006 at 20:59, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
| | On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 08:31:31AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| |
| | > Great! We have a long and shameful history of suppressing optimisation o
(Diethelm and Brian trimmed)
On 11 March 2006 at 20:59, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
| On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 08:31:31AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > Great! We have a long and shameful history of suppressing optimisation on
| > arm and m68k to enable complete compilation, so I will go bac
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 08:31:31AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Great! We have a long and shameful history of suppressing optimisation on
> arm and m68k to enable complete compilation, so I will go back to -O1 for
> m68k. Could you possibly push a manual build of the package? I don't reall
(Re-added CCs for Diethelm and Brian as heads-ups)
On 10 March 2006 at 08:02, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
| On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:19:13PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > As a general rule, I can expect to successfully mix code from gcc 3.4 and
| > 4.0, right?
| >
| > In which case, cou
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:19:13PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> As a general rule, I can expect to successfully mix code from gcc 3.4 and
> 4.0, right?
>
> In which case, could I create a -2 upload with gcc/gfortran 4.0 even though
> the rest of R and the couple dozen R-dependent packages a
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Diethelm,
Any comment from your end?
-- The code only fails on m68k (which has historically had an above-average
share of troubles with Fortran).
-- The previous fSeries released passed so it may be the new Garch code in
file 034B-GarchModelling
Diethelm,
Any comment from your end?
-- The code only fails on m68k (which has historically had an above-average
share of troubles with Fortran).
-- The previous fSeries released passed so it may be the new Garch code in
file 034B-GarchModelling.f
-- According to Stephen, gfortran 4.0 c
Hi Stephen,
On 9 March 2006 at 13:21, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
| Package: fseries
| Version: 221.10065-1
| Severity: important
|
|
| fseries fails to build from source due to a gcc-3.4 ICE on m68k. For
Ahh, the joys of Fortran on m68k ... :-/
| what it's worth, I built the package with gfort
Package: fseries
Version: 221.10065-1
Severity: important
fseries fails to build from source due to a gcc-3.4 ICE on m68k. For
what it's worth, I built the package with gfortran-4.0 and it built fine.
I'm not sure of the other implications involved with a change of
compiler.
You are welcomed t
20 matches
Mail list logo
