On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:19:13PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > As a general rule, I can expect to successfully mix code from gcc 3.4 and > 4.0, right? > > In which case, could I create a -2 upload with gcc/gfortran 4.0 even though > the rest of R and the couple dozen R-dependent packages are all built with > 3.4? I had not yet enforced gcc 4.* for R.
> | I'm not sure of the other implications involved with a change of > | compiler. I wish I could tell you the right answer. It seems like the point of gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0 was to make migration easier. > If you do 'apt-cache rdepends r-base-core' you get an idea. Not all of these > packages use compiled code, and even fewer use Fortran. > > On the other hand, would the ICE go away for this package with less (or no) > optimization ? 034B-GarchModelling.f compiles fine with -01. > | You are welcomed to do whatever you want to with this bug report. :) > > Can I tag it 'm68k-only' and make it less than 'important' severity to not > hold up all the working arches? It has built everywhere else ... Important won't cause you any problems, but feel free to change the severity and tag it anyway you'd like. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
