Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So be it. Can one of the DDs check the package on tug.org, as said, no
>> serious changes but the addition of texlive as dependency.
>
> Does someone do already? If not I'm willing to do it.
Please do it, I'm really busy these days.
Regards, Frank
--
ui, your statement
From: "Guanghui Yu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#353584: NMU of dvipdfmx
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:19:30 +0800
> Thanks for the NMUs. I'm sorry that I was almost inactive for about one year
> because of personal reason. After April, I can normally
On Mit, 01 Mär 2006, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > Does this mean we can upload the NMU (the new which only changes the
> > dependencies)?
>
> I understand that he can't normally maintain dvipdfmx before
> April so NMU is no problem.
So be it. Can one of the DDs check the package on tug.org, as said
Hi all,
From: Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NMU of dvipdfmx
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 01:10:37 +0100
> But if Guanghui and you and Frank are ok with it we can do the
> following:
> - put the dvipdfmx stuff in debian-tex svn
> - put the DD of this group into the Uploaders field
> -
Hi all!
On Die, 28 Feb 2006, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > > As long as you don't break anything, I don't have anything against it.
>
> It seemed it breaks something a bit ;-)
> CMAPFONTS = .;$TEXMF/fonts/cmap//
> CMAPINPUTS = .;/usr/share/fonts/cmap//
> so the configfile is yet necessary IMHO.
Dam
Thanks for the NMUs. I'm sorry that I was almost inactive for about one year because of personal reason. After April, I can normally maintain the packages.Thx Yu Guanghui debian.org>On 2/28/06, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,> > > As long as
Hi,
> > > As long as you don't break anything, I don't have anything against it.
>
> It seemed it breaks something a bit ;-)
>
> > - removed the texmf.d config file
> > since tex-common is already in testing, this file should thus be
> > useless
>
> tex-common sets
> CMAPFONTS = .;$TEXMF/f
Hi Norbert, Hi all,
From: Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NMU of dvipdfmx
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:46:22 +0100
> > As long as you don't break anything, I don't have anything against it.
It seemed it breaks something a bit ;-)
> - removed the texmf.d config file
> since tex-
Dear Junichi! Dear Yu!
On Mit, 22 Feb 2006, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I have seen that you have done the last NMU of dvipdfmx, and I wanted to
> > ask if we (you or me) can do another NMU with the suggested changes in
> > my bug report
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=353584,
Hi,
> I have seen that you have done the last NMU of dvipdfmx, and I wanted to
> ask if we (you or me) can do another NMU with the suggested changes in
> my bug report
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=353584, that is:
>
> - Change the dependency on tetex-bin and tetex-base
Dear Junichi!
I have seen that you have done the last NMU of dvipdfmx, and I wanted to
ask if we (you or me) can do another NMU with the suggested changes in
my bug report
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=353584, that is:
- Change the dependency on tetex-bin and tetex-base in
11 matches
Mail list logo
