From: Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: NMU of dvipdfmx Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 12:18:17 +0100
> > I understand that he can't normally maintain dvipdfmx before > > April so NMU is no problem. > > So be it. Can one of the DDs check the package on tug.org, as said, no > serious changes but the addition of texlive as dependency. Does someone do already? If not I'm willing to do it. However, as I said already, the most serious problem caused by one of NMUs was > BTW, there is messing up in dvipdfmx. Wnen Yu maintained > it there was 50dvipdfmx.cnf but now 80DVIPDFMx.cnf instead. > (contents of 80DVIPDFMx.cnf seemed better, though) > I don't know which NMU installed 80DVIPDFMx.cnf but it is > very bad states now. and it will be better if it could be fixed before Guanghui will come back again. But, Guanghui, your statement From: "Guanghui Yu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#353584: NMU of dvipdfmx Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:19:30 +0800 > Thanks for the NMUs. I'm sorry that I was almost inactive for about one year > because of personal reason. After April, I can normally maintain the > packages. is a bit ambiguous, I think. It will be great help for us if you explicitly permit us to do NMU untill you will come back again. Regards, 2006-3-6(Mon) -- Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
