On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:55:21AM -0400, SR, ESC wrote:
> Le mer 2005-08-17 a 07:34:15 -0400, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:06:09PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> > > On (17/08/05 10:52), Sven Luther wrote:
> > create a custom kernel from the sources. You w
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:53:41AM -0400, SR, ESC wrote:
> Le mer 2005-08-17 a 03:17:27 -0400, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> >
> > yep. Ideally you would netboot the kernel with something like :
> >
> > boot enet:,vmlinuz-coff.initrd
> >
> > notsure about the exact syntax though.
>
>
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:53:41AM -0400, SR, ESC wrote:
> Le mer 2005-08-17 a 03:17:27 -0400, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> >
> > yep. Ideally you would netboot the kernel with something like :
> >
> > boot enet:,vmlinuz-coff.initrd
> >
> > notsure about the exact syntax though.
>
>
Le mer 2005-08-17 a 07:34:15 -0400, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:06:09PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> > On (17/08/05 10:52), Sven Luther wrote:
> create a custom kernel from the sources. You will also need
> kernel-patch-2.4.27-powerpc
>
> So, it should b
Le mer 2005-08-17 a 03:17:27 -0400, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
>
> yep. Ideally you would netboot the kernel with something like :
>
> boot enet:,vmlinuz-coff.initrd
>
> notsure about the exact syntax though.
np, that'll help, thanks. so the kernel will get read from an ext2
partiti
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:06:09PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (17/08/05 10:52), Sven Luther wrote:
> > Subject: Re: Bug#323182: debian-installer: boot.img for sarge doesn't, on
> > PPC
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:51:49AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
&g
On (17/08/05 10:52), Sven Luther wrote:
> Subject: Re: Bug#323182: debian-installer: boot.img for sarge doesn't, on PPC
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:51:49AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> > Hi Guys
> >
> > Just to let you know, I've got a nubus machine (
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:51:49AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Just to let you know, I've got a nubus machine (8100/80) sitting here
> going spare. It's got woody on it currently but if you can make use of
> it, you're welcome to it (I'm in North London)
Cool, try booting the kerne
Hi Guys
Just to let you know, I've got a nubus machine (8100/80) sitting here
going spare. It's got woody on it currently but if you can make use of
it, you're welcome to it (I'm in North London)
Regards
Clive
--
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 02:24:27AM -0400, SR, ESC wrote:
> Le mer 2005-08-17 a 02:05:14 -0400, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:51:53AM -0400, SR, ESC wrote:
> > > > Yep, but nobody came forward and did so. This should h&ave been
> > > > mentioned in
> > > > th
Le mer 2005-08-17 a 02:05:14 -0400, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:51:53AM -0400, SR, ESC wrote:
> > > Yep, but nobody came forward and did so. This should h&ave been mentioned
> > > in
> > > the errata though at least.
> >
> > there's people who did for woody
Le mer 2005-08-17 a 01:47:03 -0400, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 06:36:39PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >
>
> I can build the miboot files and distribute them from p.d.o, they can just not
> be part of the release.
cool.
> > Rick
> >
> >
> > PS: Sven makes
Le mar 2005-08-16 a 18:37:30 -0400, Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
a dit:
>
> It's clear that, as a practical matter, Apple doesn't mind if people
> distribute the "boot block which is coming directly from Apple and
> has a couple tens of m68k assembly instructions nobody could be
> bothered to r
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:51:53AM -0400, SR, ESC wrote:
> > Yep, but nobody came forward and did so. This should h&ave been mentioned in
> > the errata though at least.
>
> there's people who did for woody, but they feel that they were
> overlooked and hurt from that, and therefore didn't pitch i
Le mer 2005-08-17 a 01:36:11 -0400, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 04:24:53PM -0400, SR, ESC wrote:
>
> > > The boot.img are the miboot floppies for oldworld pmacs. These are saddly
> > > not
> > > useable in sarge, because miboot is non-free (due to the one boot
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 06:36:39PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> It's clear that, as a practical matter, Apple doesn't mind if people
> distribute the "boot block which is coming directly from Apple and has
> a couple tens of m68k assembly instructions nobody could be bothered to
> reverse-engi
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 04:24:53PM -0400, SR, ESC wrote:
> Le lun 2005-08-15 a 17:44:46 -0400, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 06:13:12PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > severity 323182 normal
> > > thanks mate
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Ok, please ignore my previo
It's clear that, as a practical matter, Apple doesn't mind if people
distribute the "boot block which is coming directly from Apple and has
a couple tens of m68k assembly instructions nobody could be bothered to
reverse-engineer", because other Linux distributions provide it and
Apple has not
Le lun 2005-08-15 a 17:44:46 -0400, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 06:13:12PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > severity 323182 normal
> > thanks mate
> >
> >
>
> Ok, please ignore my previous mail, it is stupid.
then disregard my reply to it :).
> The boot.img
Le lun 2005-08-15 a 17:20:52 -0400, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 06:13:12PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > severity 323182 normal
> > thanks mate
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:46:11AM -0400, Simon Raven wrote:
> > > Package: debian-installer
> > > Se
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:58:54PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 15 August 2005 21:02, Sven Luther wrote:
> > As a result, the floppies present in sarge are entirely broken and will
> > never work. Also the 2.6 floppies, even with miboot present never
> > worked fiably, annd since we are doin
On Monday 15 August 2005 21:02, Sven Luther wrote:
> As a result, the floppies present in sarge are entirely broken and will
> never work. Also the 2.6 floppies, even with miboot present never
> worked fiably, annd since we are doing away with the 2.4 kernels for
> etch, this means that the miboot
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 06:13:12PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> severity 323182 normal
> thanks mate
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:46:11AM -0400, Simon Raven wrote:
> > Package: debian-installer
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
>
> The debian installer works o
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 06:13:12PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> severity 323182 normal
> thanks mate
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:46:11AM -0400, Simon Raven wrote:
> > Package: debian-installer
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
>
> The debian installer works o
Le lun 2005-08-15 a 12:25:57 -0400, Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
>
>
>
> I have seen reports of succesfull installs on PowerPC hardware
> on the debian-boot mailinglist. I have not clear how they boot.
> It could be a Mac OS boot CD-ROM and some bootstrap.
>
> Please report your p
severity 323182 normal
thanks mate
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:46:11AM -0400, Simon Raven wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
The debian installer works on systems where we[1] have acces to.
> boot.img for sarge on powerpc doesn't boot,
Package: debian-installer
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
boot.img for sarge on powerpc doesn't boot, no matter what i do, what
date i get it from (there's a 20041118/ dir on the site, tried those,
doesn't want to boot either). i've tried both 2.4 and 2.6 floppies, any
mach
27 matches
Mail list logo
