* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:54:48PM -0500, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Package: firefox
> > > Version: 1.5.dfsg-2
> > > Followup-For: Bug #309995
> > >
> > > As of 1.5.dfsg-2, the rend
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:54:48PM -0500, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Package: firefox
> > Version: 1.5.dfsg-2
> > Followup-For: Bug #309995
> >
> > As of 1.5.dfsg-2, the rendering problem for Indic scripts is still
> > present. I
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 1.5.dfsg-2
> Followup-For: Bug #309995
>
> As of 1.5.dfsg-2, the rendering problem for Indic scripts is still
> present. I think the earlier presumption that version 1.1 (which
> AFAIK has been numbered 1.5 instead) woul
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 1.5.dfsg-2
> Followup-For: Bug #309995
>
> As of 1.5.dfsg-2, the rendering problem for Indic scripts is still
> present. I think the earlier presumption that version 1.1 (which
> AFAIK has been numbered 1.5 instead) woul
Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg-2
Followup-For: Bug #309995
As of 1.5.dfsg-2, the rendering problem for Indic scripts is still
present. I think the earlier presumption that version 1.1 (which
AFAIK has been numbered 1.5 instead) would have the proper settings
enabled by default never panned ou
5 matches
Mail list logo