Bug#306272: cpufreqd: Too high CPU load

2005-04-26 Thread Leonardo Macchia
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 11:08:58 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > Shall I close this bug then? (or at least change its title and lower > its priority to whishlist) Yes, you can close it. Hope someone will fix kernel's "bug". Thank you again, Leonardo. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#306272: cpufreqd: Too high CPU load

2005-04-26 Thread Mattia Dongili
On 4/26/05, Leonardo Macchia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 18:42:11 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > > if you have a modular acpi you could simply remove acpi_ac and/or > > acpi_battery to test if things are better. > > I found what is the problem: CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y in 2.

Bug#306272: cpufreqd: Too high CPU load

2005-04-25 Thread Leonardo Macchia
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 18:42:11 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > if you have a modular acpi you could simply remove acpi_ac and/or > acpi_battery to test if things are better. I found what is the problem: CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y in 2.6.11 (but not in 2.6.10) generates a lot of CPU load if you read inf

Bug#306272: cpufreqd: Too high CPU load

2005-04-25 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 05:46:12PM +0200, Leonardo Macchia wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 17:32:36 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > > ...Anyway :) did you already tried your solution? I'm sorry, I'm pretty > > sceptical because it's battery checking that usually sucks much cpu > > with ACPI beca

Bug#306272: cpufreqd: Too high CPU load

2005-04-25 Thread Leonardo Macchia
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 17:32:36 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > I'm sorry, I'm pretty sceptical because it's battery checking that > usually sucks much cpu with ACPI because of the kernel doing busy > wait, but it's a known issue. Yes, checking /proc/acpi/battery seems the problem. Maybe it's a p

Bug#306272: cpufreqd: Too high CPU load

2005-04-25 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 02:33:00PM +0200, Leonardo Macchia wrote: > Package: cpufreqd > Version: 1.2.2-3 > Severity: minor > > Hello. > > While cicle in "main.c" (inside "get_running_programs", line 767) > consumes lot of CPU (my 1 GHz laptop powers on every two-three second > its fan because of

Bug#306272: cpufreqd: Too high CPU load

2005-04-25 Thread Leonardo Macchia
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 17:32:36 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > ...Anyway :) did you already tried your solution? I'm sorry, I'm pretty > sceptical because it's battery checking that usually sucks much cpu > with ACPI because of the kernel doing busy wait, but it's a known issue. I have about 100

Bug#306272: cpufreqd: Too high CPU load

2005-04-25 Thread Leonardo Macchia
Package: cpufreqd Version: 1.2.2-3 Severity: minor Hello. While cicle in "main.c" (inside "get_running_programs", line 767) consumes lot of CPU (my 1 GHz laptop powers on every two-three second its fan because of cpufreqd); just a little sleep between each cycle should be better. Thanks, Leonard