On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 08:50:33AM -0700, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 April 2005 08:10 pm, Charles Lepple wrote:
> > Heh. Maybe you could "borrow" the aptproxy userid.
>
> Why not just add another?
>
> > Actually, along these lines, I wonder if there's a precedent for
> > conflicti
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 08:10 pm, Charles Lepple wrote:
> Heh. Maybe you could "borrow" the aptproxy userid.
Why not just add another?
> Actually, along these lines, I wonder if there's a precedent for
> conflicting with another package with a server that binds to the same
> port. After all, t
Eric Cooper said:
>> It would be nice if approx ran as an unprivileged user. From what I can
>> tell, it doesn't need root privileges (even to bind the listening
>> socket).
>
> You're right, and another user also made the same suggestion, so I
> plan to do that. Do you have any advice on which us
> It would be nice if approx ran as an unprivileged user. From what I can
> tell, it doesn't need root privileges (even to bind the listening
> socket).
You're right, and another user also made the same suggestion, so I
plan to do that. Do you have any advice on which user/group to use?
I couldn'
Package: approx
Version: 1.09
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice if approx ran as an unprivileged user. From what I can
tell, it doesn't need root privileges (even to bind the listening
socket).
Otherwise, this program is a welcome change from apt-proxy. Performance
seems *way* better, even afte
5 matches
Mail list logo
