Bug#239820: bluez-utils: also a problem if you do have X

2005-08-21 Thread Edd Dumbill
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 19:22 +0200, Miernik wrote: > Any progress on this? It's very much wanted to fix this terrible > bloatware overkill. No, none yet. Now would be a good time though. I'll put it on my TODO list, but I'd be very happy if somebody could step up. It's as simple as making a blue

Bug#239820: bluez-utils: also a problem if you do have X

2005-08-13 Thread Miernik
Edd Dumbill wrote: > On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 15:53 +, Franck Arnaud wrote: > > This issue is also a problem if you do have X. I have a machine with > > a flash disk and a minimal X setup, and bluez-pin still wants 10MB > > of disk space (which is a large part of my available disk space) to > > in

Bug#239820: bluez-utils: also a problem if you do have X

2005-02-05 Thread Edd Dumbill
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 15:53 +, Franck Arnaud wrote: > This issue is also a problem if you do have X. I have a machine with > a flash disk and a minimal X setup, and bluez-pin still wants 10MB > of disk space (which is a large part of my available disk space) to > install all the extra rubbis

Bug#239820: bluez-utils: also a problem if you do have X

2005-02-05 Thread Franck Arnaud
Package: bluez-utils Followup-For: Bug #239820 This issue is also a problem if you do have X. I have a machine with a flash disk and a minimal X setup, and bluez-pin still wants 10MB of disk space (which is a large part of my available disk space) to install all the extra rubbish it depends on