On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 19:03:11 +0200, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> On 15.10.24 20:26, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> Thanks for doing this removal, but it looks as though all binary packages
> from the gdm3 source were removed as a batch, whether they were NBS or
> not:
>
> Hmm, strange I thou
On 15.10.24 20:26, Simon McVittie wrote:
Thanks for doing this removal, but it looks as though all binary packages
from the gdm3 source were removed as a batch, whether they were NBS or not:
Hmm, strange I thought I had adapted the parameters accordingly.
Is there a way that I should have t
On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 at 17:02:18 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Please remove the old gdm3 *binary package only* from armel.
>
> We want to keep the source package and the gir1.2-gdm-1.0, libgdm-dev,
> libgdm1 binary packages on armel (this avoids some intrusive changes in
> other packages like gno
On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 at 17:02:18 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> src:gdm3 no longer builds the gdm3 binary package for armel, as another
> step towards removing this dependency chain from armel:
>
> [many packages] -> gnome-shell -> gjs -> mozjs128
>
> Please remove the old gdm3 *binary package
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
src:gdm3 no longer builds the gdm3 binary package for armel, as another
step towards removing this dependency chain from armel:
[many packages] ->
5 matches
Mail list logo
