On 15.10.24 20:26, Simon McVittie wrote:
Thanks for doing this removal, but it looks as though all binary packages from the gdm3 source were removed as a batch, whether they were NBS or not:
Hmm, strange I thought I had adapted the parameters accordingly.
Is there a way that I should have titled this bug more clearly to distinguish between "remove binary package gdm3" and "remove all binaries from src:gdm3" while meeting the ftp team's naming conventions?
I am afraid this is not possible. But as I am only the auxiliary RM-worker, I am not completely sure.
We can work around the removal of gir1.2-gdm-1.0, libgdm-dev and libgdm1 on armel by re-uploading the gdm3 source package, and I'll aim to do that soon if it doesn't migrate on its own.
Ok, great and sorry for the hassle. Thorsten
