Hi Markus,
Please ignore my previous message about logrotate. It was my mistake that it
did not work.
Would it be an acceptable solution if the fileOwner setting is removed from
/etc/rsyslog.d/tomcat9.conf and su setting is removed from
/etc/logrotate.d/tomcat9 file which are shipped with to
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
> > What is the problem with logrotate? It happily rotates files owned
> > by anyone in Debian.
>
> Because in Ubuntu rsyslog drops privileges to `syslog` user.
> Therefore, the log files generated by rsyslog are owned by the
> `syslog` user. But tomca
Evren Yurtesen kirjoitti 29.4.2022 klo 8.42:
One solution would be undoing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/388608 at Ubuntu. But I
do not know how to reach to correct people at Ubuntu side. I also do not think
I could convince them that this is creating problems.
try u
Hi,
I am not sure if anybody received my previous e-mails as I do not see them in
the mailing list thread. :(
> What is the problem with logrotate? It happily rotates files owned by anyone
> in Debian.
Because in Ubuntu rsyslog drops privileges to `syslog` user. Therefore, the log
files gene
Nevermind my previous idea. It does not work as the /var/log/tomcat9 is group
writable by `adm` group. Causes the following problem: :(
# logrotate -f /etc/logrotate.d/tomcat9
error: skipping "/var/log/tomcat9/catalina.out" because parent directory has
insecure permissions (It's world writable
Hi Markus,
You are quite right. The root cause of the issue is Ubuntu dropping privileges
of rsyslogd to `syslog` user. This change was done way back in ~2009 in Ubuntu
package.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/388608 (which does not
explain the benefits very clearly, b
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> The submitter has provided a debdiff, too:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=1008668;filename=tomcat9_9.0.58-1ubuntu1.debdiff;msg=5.
This will break other syslog implementations, though.
What is the problem with logrotate? It ha
Am Donnerstag, dem 14.04.2022 um 16:23 +0530 schrieb Utkarsh Gupta:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> We have bug #1008668 that's causing problems on the Ubuntu side and is
> also reproducible via the Debian package (essentially, it's the same
> in both places).
Hi Utkarsh,
I have been trying to reproduce this
8 matches
Mail list logo
