Hi Chris,
I'm developer, not the package maintainer. On the source code side
didn't happened anything for some years, so there are no conflicts are
expected. From my perspective there is no need to wait.
Regards,
Oleksij
Hi Daniel,
Am 28.08.23 um 04:53 schrieb Daniel:
Package: firmware-ath9k-htc
Version: 1.4.0-108-gd856466+dfsg1-1.4
In a recent upgrade, firmware-ath9k-htc has been installed and firmware-atheros
has been removed,
after a system reboot my WiFi stopped working. To fix it I had to download and
re
Am 03.07.23 um 02:21 schrieb pe...@easthope.ca:
[43926.807143] usb 1-2: ath9k_htc: Firmware ath9k_htc/htc_9271-1.dev.0.fw
requested
This is the firmware name provided by firmware-ath9k-htc package.
[43927.619075] ath9k_htc 1-2:1.0 wlxe894f6248352: renamed from wlan0
This line shows that de
Hi John,
Am 18.04.20 um 18:39 schrieb John Scott:
>> thank you!
>>
>> I updated the package.
>
> Hi,
>
> I see you've fixed this upstream. firmware-ath9k-htc has been removed from
> Bullseye, could you use some help with a new Debian package?
Yes, I need help.
I already overloaded this months,
Hi Adrian,
thank you!
I updated the package.
Am 22.02.20 um 19:10 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> Source: open-ath9k-htc-firmware
> Version: 1.4.0-97-g75b3e59+dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs bullseye sid
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/open-ath9k-htc-firmwa
Hi Awalis,
Am 05.12.19 um 20:01 schrieb awalis:
> Package: firmware-ath9k-htc
> Version: 1.4.0-97-g75b3e59+dfsg-3
> Followup-For: Bug #895696
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Done, the workaround was added into the wiki page. Please find the link below.
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/ath9k_htc/open_firmwa
yes, it is.
please add needed information to the wiki.
--
Regards,
Oleksij
Hi,
please, make sure it is not this bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895696
In any case, there was no change in firmware-ath9k-htc. So, if there is
any issue, it is most probably kernel and not firmware.
--
Regards,
Oleksij
t initial discussion for binutils-xtensa-lx106.
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff: Re: Bug#917546: binutils-xtensa-lx106 is a wrong name
Datum: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 21:38:46 +0100
Von: Oleksij Rempel
An: 917...@bugs.debian.org
Am 29.12.18 um 19:37 schrieb Jonathan McDowell:
> On
Am 29.12.18 um 19:37 schrieb Jonathan McDowell:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 07:26:12PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>> Am 29.12.18 um 19:11 schrieb Jonathan McDowell:
>>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 05:41:47PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>>>> If it is plain Xtensa Diamond
Am 29.12.18 um 19:11 schrieb Jonathan McDowell:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 05:41:47PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>> Am 29.12.18 um 16:56 schrieb Jonathan McDowell:
>>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 02:02:01PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>>>> Am 29.12.18 um 12:16 schrieb J
Am 29.12.18 um 16:56 schrieb Jonathan McDowell:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 02:02:01PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>> Am 29.12.18 um 12:16 schrieb Jonathan McDowell:
>>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 08:11:31AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>>>> in my experience with xtensa,
Am 29.12.18 um 12:16 schrieb Jonathan McDowell:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 08:11:31AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>> in my experience with xtensa, it has some basic customizable
>> core/instruction set (in this case it is lx106) which is then optimized
>> for some applica
Hi,
in my experience with xtensa, it has some basic customizable
core/instruction set (in this case it is lx106) which is then optimized
for some application (for example for esp8266). At the end, this
toolchain won't be able to build binary for different lx106 based
hardware. In this case the nam
If I see it correctly, there is no way to have (default) gcc-source.
I'll update it to gcc-8-source.
--
Regards,
Oleksij
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: openocd
Version: 0.10.0-4
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The package depends on libjaylink0 which is already included in to
the source code of OpenOCD.
See openocd/src/jtag/drivers/libjaylink/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990
Hi,
firmware has no idea about interface name.
Most probably you are affected by this bug:
https://github.com/qca/open-ath9k-htc-firmware/issues/132
--
Regards,
Oleksij
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 11.09.2017 um 21:41 schrieb Diego Roversi:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 19:36:46 +0200
> Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>
>>> I didn't expected that a reboot was needed. I wonder if there is a way to
>>> avoid to reboot.
>>
>> Suddenly not really. It is kind of co
did you tried to reboot the system or reload driver?
This name needs extra module parametr to be enabled.
--
Regards,
Oleksij
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 30.08.2017 um 16:05 schrieb Stuart Prescott:
> Source: open-ath9k-htc-firmware
> Version: 1.4.0-81-gf206e56+dfsg-2
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The dbgsym package firmware-ath9k-htc-dbgsym should not be listed in
> debian/control and should not end up in the main Debian archi
Am 31.03.2017 um 19:17 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 18:52 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> [..]
>> I don't think it makes any sense. Why should we symlink some thing
>> different/not_stable to file name of stable firmware?
>> Especially if we have 1
Am 31.03.2017 um 15:26 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 08:15 +0300, Paul Fertser wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:04:24PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 09:22 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Source: linux
Version: 4.10~rc6-1~exp1
Severity: wishlist
>
Hi,
Am 31.03.2017 um 07:15 schrieb Paul Fertser:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:04:24PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 09:22 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Source: linux
Version: 4.10~rc6-1~exp1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: open-ath9k-htc-firmw...@packages.debian.org
Now that open
Am 13.10.2016 um 05:55 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Paul Fertser wrote:
>
>> Cc: Oleksij Rempel
>
> Please use the X-Debbugs-CC pseudo-header when submitting bugs instead
> of CC, so that the recipients get the bug number too. Put it just
> af
24 matches
Mail list logo
