Hi, in my experience with xtensa, it has some basic customizable core/instruction set (in this case it is lx106) which is then optimized for some application (for example for esp8266). At the end, this toolchain won't be able to build binary for different lx106 based hardware. In this case the naming is wrong. It should be: binutils-xtensa-lx106-esp8266 binutils-espressif-esp8266 binutils-xtensa-lx106-espressif-esp8266 or some thing like this...
If debian maintainers will decide to include this toolchain, then we need to develop unified naming shema for this kind of toolchains, because we already have completely opened firmware based on xtenas for different hardware, see firmware-ath9k-htc package. Extra toolchain for this package will make step forward reproducible builds. -- Regards, Oleksij
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
