On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 19:14:48 +0100, Alex Constantino wrote:
> This reverts commit 5a838e5d5825c85556011478abde708251cc0776.
>
> Changes from commit 5a838e5d5825 ("drm/qxl: simplify qxl_fence_wait") would
> result in a '[TTM] Buffer eviction failed' exception whenever it reached a
> timeout.
> Due
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 04:25:48PM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten
Leemhuis) wrote:
> On 08.03.24 02:08, Alex Constantino wrote:
> > Fix OOM scenario by doing multiple notifications to the OOM handler through
> > a busy wait logic.
> > Changes from commit 5a838e5d5825 ("drm/qxl: si
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 03:23:33PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24-07-15 15:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:58:31PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>There is slightly more to it then those 5 lines, but yes we should enable
> >>vol
it without any schematics (and boards I guess?) is a good thing
when it comes to something that can permanently damage a board.
I'd expect that such changes would be carefully done and tested before
being submitted.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel
evice trees of the other 5 A20 devices enable CPU voltage scaling
> there?
That and
https://github.com/RobertCNelson/u-boot/blob/master/arch/arm/dts/sun7i-a20-cubietruck.dts#L108-L110
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
So any mechanical change is not something that can be done. Especially
for something that might blow up your board.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/cpu0/cpufreq/
> and altering parameters always had an effect.
Yes, and it had an effect on the frequency, not the voltage.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
a/config/linux-sunxi-next.config
# CONFIG_REGULATOR_AXP20X is not set
> What puzzles me is that exactly the same kernel (I used Igor Pečovnik's
> build system) provides working cpufreq support on 5 A20 devices and one it
> fails.
And none of those 5 use CPU voltage scaling.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:34:34AM +0200, Leonardo Canducci wrote:
> Attaching kernel config files from /boot (3.16, 4.0 and 4.1 from stable,
> unstable and experimental).
We're using the cpufreq-dt driver, that is compiled as a module. Is
the module loaded?
Maxime
--
Maxime R
s in there, but the whole kernel
configuration seems to be missing, could you provide it please?
Thanks,
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
10 matches
Mail list logo
