On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 03:23:33PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 24-07-15 15:16, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:58:31PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>There is slightly more to it then those 5 lines, but yes we should enable > >>voltage scaling on more boards. This mostly requires someone to simply > >>just do the work. > >> > >>I've a workshop on dts this weekend at our localhacker space and the plan > >>is for the people attending to get some handson experience by them doing > >>this work (amongst other things) :) > > > >While I agree with you on the fact that more board needs to have the > >regulators enabled, I really don't think that making some newbies > >doing it without any schematics (and boards I guess?) > > They will only be writing patches for boards which I have, and the patches > will be tested on the actual boards before submitting them upstream. > > I will be collecting and double checking all patches before sending them > to you. > > I will let you know if they blow up any boards :) But I do not really > expect that to happen. > > > is a good thing > >when it comes to something that can permanently damage a board. > > > >I'd expect that such changes would be carefully done and tested before > >being submitted. > > And they will be, see above.
Perfect then :) My point was simply that we shouldn't have automated changes for this, just for the sake of having regulators for all the boards. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature