Hi all,
I am both the Debian maintainer and part of "upstream" ... I have
discussed this with the co-author of the xscorch project and we do not
have any time or intent to do another GTK upgrade right now. The GTK2
update was effectively a large part of what killed the project in the
first
Hello all,
Is there an ETA for old-sec? The latest version for wheezy is still
7.0.28-4+deb7u10 which is impacted by the regression (status 400).
Thanks,
-Jacob
Hi Felipe,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 03:00:29PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > It is plenty usable, just not if you are using systemd. Yes, I am aware
> > policy at this point requires systemd support.
>
> OK, sorry. The impression I had from your earlier message is that it
> didn't work[1].
A
Hi Felipe,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:50:33AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Apparently, fcow-utils as currently packaged is not usable in
> debian.
It is plenty usable, just not if you are using systemd. Yes, I am aware
policy at this point requires systemd support.
> Jacob Luna
Hello,
I think this bug has a lot of dev and ops misunderstanding. It's not
surprising dev folks think the postinstall hack is good enough, but from
an ops perspective it very much is not. Rather than trying to argue
that point, let's just move ahead with solving the core problem
(debootstr
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 07:29:33PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Not sure since when it started to fail, but it does not start up at all today:
Since the +b1; I assume there must have been API changes. Thank you for
taking the time to report this. I am going to try and get it taken care
of befo
I rebuilt my root array with a modern superblock and now grub handles it
just fine. This problem is most likely specific to the old v0.90
layout. So it's still a bug in grub but I can't help test any fixes
anymore. However, this does provide a (painful) way forward for people
hitting the bu
I can confirm this bug report. I also have root RAID 1 (and it's an old
RAID volume created August 12th, 2005 so probably on an etch system).
Upgrading to grub-pc 2.00-14 rendered my system unbootable (in the grub
recovery console, my disks showed up but all their partitions were
missing).
Hi all,
I am seeing the same problem in wheezy with e-mail from a CRON task I
wrote. I get e-mail every five minutes like clockwork! :)
The patch in comment 42 completely resolved the issue for me.
Thanks,
-Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Version: 0.37.1-1
I can confirm this bug.
cgconfig.conf:
mount {
cpu = /sys/fs/cgroup;
cpuacct = /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuacct;
devices = /sys/fs/cgroup/devices;
memory = /sys/fs/cgroup/memory;
}
group firefox {
perm {
task {
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 01:31:46AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> As you have written "libreadline5-dev | libreadline6-dev", then I assume
> you have the sense that there is probably license issue with
> libreadline6-dev, so you choose libreadline5-dev over it by default, and
> you keep the latter o
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 09:07:37PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> retitle 636188 Please use libreadline-gplv2-dev instead of libreadline5-dev
> thanks
I will prepare a new version using libreadline-gplv2-dev. Thank you for
pointing out the license issue.
> Again, please check your package is bui
Ahh, the joys of GDK/GTK and their ever-changing APIs. If only somebody
would give me a nickel for every time the deprecate an interface...
I have a new package built so once I get someone to upload it for me,
this will be fixed, until a month from now when they break some other
interface ins
Probably it means this bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31675
I just hit the same thing in squeeze myself.
-Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 10:06:00AM -0800, Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote:
> I just hit the same thing in squeeze myself.
Argh, I meant sid.
-Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
This is still happening with squeeze. It's something in the environment
left over from the installer. This bit of bash is working for me in my
post-install script:
# Environment
unset -v $(set | sed -e 's/=.*//g' | egrep -v
'^(BASH*|HO*|IFS|PATH*|PWD|SHELL*|TERM*)')
. /etc/profile
export LA
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The new version (1.0) of ifpgui explicitly uses libusb-1.0 in the source.
According to a thread in debian-bsd [1], there is no plan to provide
libusb-1.0-0-dev in the kfreebsd arches. Also, the package has never
built for herd (because there is no libusb
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:26:50PM +0200, J??r??my Lal wrote:
> On 28/07/2010 15:14, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:46:16AM -0400, Holger Levsen wrote:
> >> how is that different to dsh, already present in Debian?
> > Or clusterssh ?
> Or mssh ?
As I alluded to in the
Hi Holger,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:46:16AM -0400, Holger Levsen wrote:
> how is that different to dsh, already present in Debian?
They are similar. They have even both been around for a fair while now
without recent changes. I find mussh a little more convenient to use.
Also, mussh is ju
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jacob Luna Lundberg
* Package name: mussh
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : dough...@doughnut.net
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/mussh/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: bash
Description : MUltihost SSH
Hi,
I can confirm this bug. My eth0 is an RTL8169sc/8110sc. I was just
trying to figure out why it was in half duplex mode. Good to know it
isn't really.
kyo:~# mii-tool -v eth0
eth0: negotiated 1000baseT-HD flow-control, link ok
product info: vendor 00:07:32, model 17 rev 2
basic mode:
I updated BIND9 on my stable hosts today and now they exhibit the same
behavior. I agree with Martin -- please use the filesystem permissions.
-Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jacob Luna Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ifpgui
Version : 0.10.7
Upstream Author : Jim Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ifpgui.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL, BSD
Program
If for some reason anyone wants the specific patch which addresses this
vulnerability (as opposed to the larger diff in 0.2.0-4), it can be
downloaded from the xscorch website at the following location:
http://www.xscorch.org/releases/xscorch-0.2.0-stack-smash.patch.gz
-Jacob
--
Hail Ilpalla
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:45:05AM -0800, Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:37:52AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Well, I can't confirm this. Jacob, please consider the attached
> > patch, which fixes some quoting issues in configure.ac and
> &g
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:37:52AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Is it confirmed that this stack smash bug is a security vulnerability?
> Not all are...
I am not aware of any security issues with this stack smash. You can
overwrite up to 10 chars of stack but I certainly don't know how I would
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 05:45:44PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
> group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
> produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most
> recent version in
27 matches
Mail list logo
