> I don't see how that makes the package as a whole unusable, but anyway.
> I'll leave that up to Tollef.
Point taken. (I thought it might be rather off-putting to users to see graphics break in a quite drastic way.)
> ..
>>
>> Versions of packages systemd recommends:>>> pn libpam-systemd
>>
Package: systemd
Version: 44-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Installation of systemd-sysv
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective
Subject: hal not creating any input capabilities at all
Package: hal
Version: 0.5.12~git20090406.46dc48-2
Severity: important
hal does not create any input records on my system. As a result my
(usb) mouse and (ps/2) keyboard have to be configured
the old-fashioned way via xorg.conf (or will not be
Yes, please close the bug.
Cheers,
Arne
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:14:45 +0200
Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> [don't forget to CC the bug]
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 08:10:17PM +0200, Arne Ahrend wrote:
> > Good gracious -- a lot of time has passed indeed. But kudos for fol
I accidentially hit 'send' too early, sorry.
Please refer to #359982 instead.
Arne
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gs-gpl
Version: 8.50-1
Severity: important
I am resubmitting my earlier patch with adjustments for the 8.50-1 package, see
also
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=352133
Three header files (ttfoutl.h, tttype.h and tttypes.h) implicitly assume that
'long' is
32 bit, caus
Package: gs-gpl
Version: 8.50-1
Severity: important
tttype.h
I am resubmitting my earlier patch with adjustments for the 8.50-1 package, see
also
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=352133
Three header files (ttfoutl.h, tttype.h and tttypes.h) implicitly assume that
'long' is
32 b
Package: gs-gpl
Version: 8.15-4.1
Severity: important
On amd64 certain ps and pdf files (for instance ones created by OpenOffice)
are incorrectly rendered in very small text size, both on screen and printout.
The newest (non-GPL) upstream version fixes this, see also
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/
For reference, this is reported upstream and has had low
priority since mid 2004, see http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687484
Arne
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I forgot to include the log file of the single apt-get install tetex-extra run.
tetex-extra-apt.log
===
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following extra packages will be installed:
tetex-base tetex-bin texinfo
Suggested packages:
xpdf-reader pdf-viewer c
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 19:16:39 +0200
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- tetex-extra.updmap.err 2005-10-08 17:21:28.0 +0200
> > +++ tetex-extra.updmap.err-with-x-in-updmap 2005-10-08
> > 17:22:08.0 +0200
>
> > --rw-r--r-- 1 root root 33657 2005-10-08 00:28 p
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:00:24 +0200
Arne Ahrend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Oct 2005 14:43:01 +0200
> Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Let me make sure I understand what you are saying:
> >
> > Simply changing the line '
On Sat, 08 Oct 2005 14:43:01 +0200
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me make sure I understand what you are saying:
>
> Simply changing the line 'if updmap 2> $tempfile; then' into
> 'if /bin/sh /usr/bin/updmap 2> $tempfile; then' in
> tetex-extra.postinst and running 'tetex-e
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 21:01:36 +0200
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess we should simply remove it. As the submitter already purged
> the old installation we can't do dig further into this.
>
> Arne is it to close this bug then?
As I see it the status is:
1) I cannot reproduce th
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 13:28:42 +0200
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dpkg -S usr/share/texmf/ | egrep -v 'tetex-base|tetex-bin|tetex-extra' | cut
> -d ':' -f 1 | sort -u
>
> and then for each package this lists:
>
> apt-get --reinstall install
Thanks for pointing that out. Indeed I ne
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 18:35:17 +0200
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arne Ahrend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > dlocate does not seem to care for usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg.
>
> That one shouldn't be there. We've had this two times befo
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:00:19 +0200
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have dlocate installed? If yes, please send us the output of
Not until now :->
> dlocate updmap.log
(returns nothing)
> dlocate updmap.cfg
tetex-base: /usr/share/tetex-base/updmap.cfg
tetex-base: /usr/share/t
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:16:30 +0200
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This shows that updmap is in fact executed, but it seems that it does
> not do the right thing. However, it should save a detailed log of its
> actions in /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.log. Can you please make repeat
> th
On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 18:50:05 +0200
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst configure > extra-postinst.lg
> 2>&1
Voila. This dutifully runs updmap which in turn touches
/var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map,
but does not change it from the st
ing file extra-postinst.lg.
Here it is. As requested I have not passed any arguments, so the bottom part
of /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst is not reached.
Kind regards,
Arne Ahrend
+ set -e
+ PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11
+ envvars='
AFMFONTS BIBINPUTS BSTINPUT
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:03:42 +0200
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don't, by chance, have backups of the old psfonts_t1.map
> and/or of the updmap log file - either as
> /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.log, or /tmp/updm*? If you have some of
> these, please send them - but only the ol
script to supply the pin, it is attached below.
Arne Ahrend
--
Excerpt from /var/log/daemon.log:
Sep 27 18:29:21 hellas hcid[2788]: Bluetooth HCI daemon
Sep 27 18:29:21 hellas sdpd[2790]: Bluetooth SDP daemon
Sep 27 18:29:21 hellas hcid[2788]: HCI dev 0 up
Sep 27 18:29:21 hellas hcid
Package: tetex-base
Version: 2.0.2c-8
Severity: normal
After a fresh install (AMD64) dvips -Pwww or -Poutline would not use the .pfb
fonts. However, -Pcmz would.
I believe this is due to missing entries in
/var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map. Running updmap manually
once resolves the is
23 matches
Mail list logo
