Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:49:31AM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun 19 Jan 2025 at 02:32pm +01, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> > I just have uploaded git/1:2.47.2-0.1 to delayed/2 and posted the
> > debdiff for Jonathan.
>
> Nice.
>
> > I still prefer to hold back the bookwo
Source: python-librtmp
Version: 0.3.0-1.2
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: 1047...@bugs.debian.org, 1075...@bugs.debian.org, Debian Python
Team , Stefan Breunig ,
Package Salvaging Team
Hi,
I'm interested in salvaging your package python-librtmp, in accordance
with the Package Salvaging proce
Dear Debian Virtualbox Team, Gianfranco and Ritesh,
Is there anything I can do to help get this AppStream fix into unstable?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Here is an slightly updated patch. I would be happy to do a NMU if
that is required to get this fix into unstable.
diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright
index ca9b7f25..f87a8aa8 100644
--- a/debian/copyright
+++ b/debian/copyright
@@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ Copyright: 2007-2013 Daniel Baumann
Dear Debian X Strike Force,
Is there anything I can do to help get this AppStream fix into unstable?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Dear Debian Java Maintainers and Roger,
Is there anything I can to do get this AppStream fix into unstable?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Dear A. Maitland,
Is there anything I can do to help get this AppStream fix into unstable?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Dear Debian Hamradio Maintainers and Andreas,
Is there anything I can do to help get this AppStream fix into unstable?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Hi!
Sorry for the long delay, I didn't have time to import new RocksDB
until yesterday and today. I have now a MR pending at
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rocksdb/-/merge_requests/9 for
co-maintainer review and will upload to unstable hopefully soon, with
high likelihood that this fixes #1088523
Dear Debian NVIDIA Maintainers, Andreas and Luca,
Is there anything I can do to help get this AppStream fix into unstable?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Dear Antonio,
Is there anything I can do to help get this AppStream fix into unstable?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Dear Bastien,
Is there anything I can do to help get this AppStream fix into unstable?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Dear Debian Kernel Team, Maximilian, Ben, Salvatore and Bastian,
Is there anything I can do to help get this AppStream fix into unstable?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Dear Debian Bluetooth Maintainers and Nobuhiro Iwamatsu,
Is there anything I can do to help get this Appstream patch applied in unstable?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 03:10:06PM +, Berli Gayathri wrote:
>Hello, Tony.
>I've modified the package with your comments; please verify and sponsor
>the package for upload. Thank you in advance! 😊
Package uploaded. Thank you for your contributions to Debian!
Cheers,
tony
Dear Debian Kernel Team, Salvatore and Ben,
Is there anything I can do to help get this AppStream fix into unstable?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Dear Eduard, Cyril and Roger,
Is there anything I can do to help get this AppStream fix into unstable?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: w3m
Version: 0.5.3+git20230121-2.1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
* What led up to the situation?
Checking for defects with a new version
test-[g|n]roff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -rF0 -rHY=0 -rCHECKSTYLE=10 -ww -z < "man
page"
[Use "groff -e ' $' " to find obvious trailing spaces.]
> "Jeremy" == Jeremy Bícha writes:
FWIW, I think it is desirable to get as many man pages as we can.
To that end, I hope policy continues to:
*encourage writing man pages
* Encourage maintainers to take well written man pages as patches.
At the time that section of policy was last written,
Package: python3-virtualenv
Version: 20.28.0+ds-1
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
* What led up to the situation?
Checking for defects with a new version
test-[g|n]roff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -rF0 -rHY=0 -rCHECKSTYLE=10 -ww -z < "man
page"
[Use "groff -e ' $' " to find obvious trailing sp
Package: libnss3-tools
Version: 2:3.107-1
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
* What led up to the situation?
Checking for defects with a new version
test-[g|n]roff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -rF0 -rHY=0 -rCHECKSTYLE=10 -ww -z < "man
page"
[Use "groff -e ' $' " to find obvious trailing spaces.]
Package: valgrind
Version: 1:3.20.0-2.1
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
* What led up to the situation?
Checking for defects with a new version
test-[g|n]roff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -rF0 -rHY=0 -rCHECKSTYLE=10 -ww -z < "man
page"
[Use "groff -e ' $' " to find obvious trailing spaces.]
I'm not the maintainer but I think a better way to implement this is
to have the source package goldendict-ng provide the transitional
package, possibly with a dh_gencontrol hack to keep the version number
of the transitional package "low".
Boyuan Yang, since you were until very recently the maint
Package: libnss3-tools
Version: 2:3.107-1
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
* What led up to the situation?
Checking for defects with a new version
test-[g|n]roff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -rF0 -rHY=0 -rCHECKSTYLE=10 -ww -z < "man
page"
[Use "groff -e ' $' " to find obvious trailing spaces.]
Package: xfe
Version: 1.46.2-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
since at least the penultimate version (these last months), I experienced with
Xfe (only) a strange and really annoying bug during file rename or creation :
the character input is just random !
For instance, if I press a letter
Source: debian-policy
Version: 4.7.0.2
Debian Policy §12.1 has this section:
"Each program, utility, and function should have an associated manual
page included in the same package or a dependency. It is suggested
that all configuration files also have a manual page included as well.
Manual pages
Sebastian Humenda, le ven. 24 janv. 2025 21:40:12 +0100, a ecrit:
> Samuel Thibault schrieb am 24.01.2025, 20:40 +0100:
> >Chris Hofstaedtler, le ven. 24 janv. 2025 20:28:18 +0100, a ecrit:
> >> Yes, this is true. This is a transitive build-dep chain:
> >>
> >> espeak-ng build-depends ruby-kra
Package: xfe
Version: 1.46.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
two weeks ago, the Xfe author made available a new (major) version : 2.0, with
some interesting new features.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/xfe/files/xfe/2.0/
Could you create a package for this new version, please ?
BTW : th
Package: netpbm
Version: 2:11.08.02-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
* What led up to the situation?
Checking for defects with a new version
test-[g|n]roff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -rF0 -rHY=0 -rCHECKSTYLE=10 -ww -z < "man
page"
[Use "groff -e ' $' " to find obvious trailing spaces.]
["tes
Hi Lukas,
didn't you assign this and other related bugs to the wrong package?
osmo-bsc does not directly depend on either bctoolbox or mbedtls!? So how
could I fix this issue?
Thorsten
Source: nanoc
Version: 4.13.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Error: exp
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-j...@lists.debian.org, werdah...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: ltex-ls-plus
Version : 18.4.0
Upstream Contact: Julian Valentin, Daniel Spitzer, LTeX+ Development
Community
* URL
Control: tag -1 + unreproducible
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 21:30:26 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libsgml-parser-opensp-perl
> Version: 0.994-7
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs
Package: mtools
Version: 4.0.47-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
* What led up to the situation?
Checking for defects with a new version
test-[g|n]roff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -rF0 -rHY=0 -rCHECKSTYLE=10 -ww -z < "man
page"
[Use "groff -e ' $' " to find obvious trailing spaces.]
["test-gr
Special-casing G_FILE_ERROR_NOENT sounds like a good plan,
but silencing the error altogether might be a step too far -
it would be nice to get a hint if I accidentally mkdir
`.../rules.e` instead of `.../rules.d`.
I've now added a commit to the PR so G_FILE_ERROR_NOENT
is logged at LOG_LEVEL_INF
Package: usbutils
Version: 1:018-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
* What led up to the situation?
Checking for defects with a new version
test-[g|n]roff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -rF0 -rHY=0 -rCHECKSTYLE=10 -ww -z < "man
page"
[Use "groff -e ' $' " to find obvious trailing spaces.]
["test-g
Package: icu-devtools
Version: 72.1-6
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
* What led up to the situation?
Checking for defects with a new version
test-[g|n]roff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -rF0 -rHY=0 -rCHECKSTYLE=10 -ww -z < "man
page"
[Use "groff -e ' $' " to find obvious trailing spaces.]
["tes
On 2024-04-11, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed that
> pympress could not be built reproducibly.
>
> This is because the generated documentation included memory references
> such as the following:
>
> pointer = 0x1d4cf90)>
>
> A patch attached
I believe this is a ~dupe of #1061772. Also there's maybe the start of
some packaging in the debcargo-conf repository.
* Sylvestre Ledru (sylves...@debian.org) wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Sylvestre Ledru
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:42:23 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
> Package: lists.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear listmasters,
>
> I'm currently planning to host a minidebconf in autummn 2020 in
Regensburg,
> and therefore a list would be helpful for discussion and docmentation
> and as an conta
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2025-01-14 22:18:30)
> Quoting James McCoy (2025-01-14 21:51:13)
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 09:39:45PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > a) librust-tree-sitter-cli-dev v0.22 does *not* exist
> >
> > That was an oversight when collapsing everything into src:tree-sitter
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthias Geiger
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-r...@lists.debian.org,
werdah...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: cxxbridge-cmd
Version : 1.0.137
Upstream Contact: David Tolnay
Source: osmo-bts
Version: 1.7.2+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: mrc
Version: 1.3.14-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
&
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 20:17:02 +, Andrew Sayers wrote:
> Observed:
> Error opening rules directory: Error opening directory
> “/usr/local/share/polkit-1/rules.d”: No such file or directory (g-file-error-
> quark, 4)
> Error opening rules directory: Error opening directory
> “/run/polkit-1/rul
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 19:34:28 +0100 Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Sylvestre Ledru
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: jj
> * URL : https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj
> * License : Apache 2
> Programming Lang
Source: udptunnel
Version: 1.1-11
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it regularly fails on s390x.
Because the unstable-to-testing migration software now blocks on
reg
Source: testu01
Version: 1.2.3+ds1-2.1
Tags: sid trixie
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since
recently. Can you please investigate the situation and fix it? I copied
some of th
Hi,
Regarding this specific issue, I used a patch from Fedora to change the
default server URL from https://vagrantcloud.com to
https://vagrantcloud.com/api/v2/vagrant.
I made uploads to unstable (2.3.7+git20230731.5fc64cde+dfsg-3) and
stable(-proposed-updates) (2.3.4+dfsg-1+deb12u1).
Note that
Source: restrictedpython
Version: 6.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for restrictedpython.
CVE-2025-22153[0]:
| RestrictedPython is a tool that helps to define a subset of the
| Python
Source: giza
Version: 1.4.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]: Entering direct
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 07:21:05PM +0100, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> Yes, I am aware of the new version. However it is quite a big change
> and has a few new dependencies that need to be added to Debian first.
>
> I currently have something that builds locally, but more work and
> testing is needed.
Package: wnpp
Owner: William Desportes
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : dmarc-srg
* Version : 2.2.1
* Upstream Author : Aleksey Andreev
* URL : https://github.com/liuch/dmarc-srg
* License : GPL-3.0
* Programming Lang: PHP
* Description : A php parser, viewer and summary report generator for
Control: severity -1 serious
I was about to submit the bug report below, but that would be a duplicate.
Source: libsendmail-milter-perl
Version: 0.18-10
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your pac
Source: osmo-msc
Version: 1.12.0+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: pystray
Version: 0.19.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules clean
&
Source: csound
Version: 1:6.18.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package because it
showed up on the excuses list of glibc. I noticed that it regularly
fails on s390x.
Because the
Source: nodejs
Version: 20.18.1+dfsg-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerabilities were published for nodejs.
CVE-2025-23083[0]:
| With the aid of the diagnostics_channel utilit
Source: lime
Version: 5.2.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: redmine
Version: 5.1.3+ds-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: vagrant-hostmanager
Version: 1.8.9-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: msopenh264
Version: 5.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libsgml-parser-opensp-perl
Version: 0.994-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Control: retitle -1 Requesting a 'debian-arm-apple' mailing list
Hi.
In the spirit of the rationale and description conveyed in the opening
email of this bug report, since the mailing list is not meant to be
limited to the Bananas Team alone, it was decided that the mailing list
should be ca
Hi Lucas,
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 09:30:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: phosh-mobile-settings
> Version: 0.44.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
This is caused
Source: python-libcst
Version: 1.4.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: mediastreamer2
Version: 1:5.2.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: sight
Version: 24.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: sass-spec
Version: 3.6.3-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
On 1/24/25 1:33 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 06:40:51PM +, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 1/24/25 16:30, Xan Charbonnet wrote:
>>> On 1/24/25 04:33, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
Thanks for narrowing it down. Xan, can you try this change please?
Waiter
Source: transgui
Version: 5.18.0+dfsg-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
On 24.01.25 Hilmar Preuße (hill...@web.de) wrote:
> On 24.01.25 10:17, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hello Andreas,
> > I'm interested in salvaging your package latexila, in accordance with
> > the Package Salvaging procedure outlined in the Developers Reference[1].
> > Your package meets the criteria for
Hi
Samuel Thibault schrieb am 24.01.2025, 20:40 +0100:
>Chris Hofstaedtler, le ven. 24 janv. 2025 20:28:18 +0100, a ecrit:
>> Yes, this is true. This is a transitive build-dep chain:
>>
>> espeak-ng build-depends ruby-kramdown
>> ruby-kramdown build-depends ruby-stringex
>> ruby-stringex
Source: dqlite
Version: 1.18.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This looks similar to #1069400 but this one is
Hi Pavel,
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 06:40:51PM +, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 1/24/25 16:30, Xan Charbonnet wrote:
> > On 1/24/25 04:33, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> > > Thanks for narrowing it down. Xan, can you try this change please?
> > > Waiters can miss wake ups without it, seems to match the de
Control: forcemerge #1092890 -1
Hi,
On Fr 24 Jan 2025 19:58:21 CET, Aditi Mishra wrote:
Package: lomiri-system-settings
Version: 1.3.0-3
Architecture: ppc64el
I'm getting following error:
12: Test command: /usr/bin/xvfb-run "-s" "-screen 0 640x480x24" "-a"
"/<>/obj-powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Source: vagrant-libvirt
Version: 0.12.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: git-reintegrate
Version: 0.4-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: python-django-guid
Version: 3.4.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: rsyslog
Version: 8.2412.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Enter
Source: wordnet
Version: 1:3.0-38
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: graide
Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: bzrtp
Version: 5.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: fcitx5-m17n
Version: 5.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: ruby-memory-profiler
Version: 1.0.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: csaps
Version: 1.2.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: density-fitness
Version: 1.0.12-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: python-qtawesome
Version: 1.3.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ctioga2
Version: 0.14.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libmodbus
Version: 3.1.11-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: coinor-symphony
Version: 5.6.17+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: belle-sip
Version: 5.2.0+dfsg-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-tld
Version: 0.13-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: vagrant-librarian-puppet
Version: 0.9.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ngspetsc
Version: 0.0.8-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: ruby-mongo
Version: 2.5.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules cl
Source: ruby-childprocess
Version: 4.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cannot l
Source: vagrant-mutate
Version: 1.2.0-4.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: vagrant-cachier
Version: 1.2.1-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-glycin-utils
Version: 3.0.0~alpha.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
1 - 100 of 295 matches
Mail list logo
