Sebastian Humenda, le ven. 24 janv. 2025 21:40:12 +0100, a ecrit: > Samuel Thibault schrieb am 24.01.2025, 20:40 +0100: > >Chris Hofstaedtler, le ven. 24 janv. 2025 20:28:18 +0100, a ecrit: > >> Yes, this is true. This is a transitive build-dep chain: > >> > >> espeak-ng build-depends ruby-kramdown > >> ruby-kramdown build-depends ruby-stringex > >> ruby-stringex build-depends rails > >> rails build-depends ruby-webmock > >> ruby-webmock build-depends ruby-em-socksify > […] > >> With the available data it's hard to tell if changing espeak-ng > >> will indeed stop making rails, ruby-webmock, ruby-em-socksify key. > >> But if you have the cycles, please give it a try. > […] > >I'll be happy to see somebody submit a patch to upstream that fallsback > >to another md-to-html processor that would be less trouble (I have no > >idea what could be used here, at best it'd be pandoc, which is most > >probably really not a good idea :) > > What is the issue with Pandoc?
Is ghc already a key package? Samuel
