Hi,
Hi Steven & other kfreebsd porters,
Steven Chamberlain wrote (07 Nov 2014 14:10:15 GMT) :
> Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> For FreeBSD I came up with the attached, hackish workaround
>> using SO_TYPE (widely available), and out of the available
>> protocols in PF_LOCAL (= AF_UNIX), assume that
Hi,
On Montag, 10. November 2014, intrigeri wrote:
> [...] I'm sorry I can't
> really give you folks more time, as the window to get fixes for
> important bugs into Jessie closes early in December.
not wanting to interfere with intrigeris plans (which I think are sensible!),
but this doesn't rea
Hei hei,
Am 2014-11-10 00:15, schrieb Steven Chamberlain:
> Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> We discussed kfreebsd at length, but are not satisfied that a
>> release with Jessie will be of sufficient quality. We are dropping
>> it as an official release architecture,
>
> I hope we can come up with a
Hello everyone
I am new to the list and to kFreeBSD, but I am long time Debian user,
Debian sysadm for various private and cloud servers, and sincere
Debian lover.
I know kFreeBSD since many years, but I only tried the Ging live cd years ago.
In the last days I gained more and more interest in kFr
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
We discussed kfreebsd at length, but are not satisfied that a
release with Jessie will be of sufficient quality. We are dropping
it as an official release architecture,
:-(
I think we could support the kfreebsd core packages for an unofficial
stable release, but we'd
Petr Salinger wrote:
> >Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> >>[...] though we do hope that the
> >>porters will be able to make a simultaneous unofficial release.
>
> It is unclear, what we have to duplicate. Do we stay in testing ?
I'd like to know this as soon as possible as it affects our planning.
Th
* Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org) [141110 23:10]:
> Petr Salinger wrote:
> > >Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > >>[...] though we do hope that the
> > >>porters will be able to make a simultaneous unofficial release.
> >
> > It is unclear, what we have to duplicate. Do we stay in testing ?
>
Hi,
Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org) [141110 23:10]:
> > Petr Salinger wrote:
> > > It is unclear, what we have to duplicate. Do we stay in testing ?
> >
> > I'd like to know this as soon as possible as it affects our planning.
> > Thanks.
> >
> > If we don't stay
Hi everyone,
I'd really like to hear others' thoughts on my ideas in this thread.
This can only happen with many people working together, so I need to
know which ideas from my brainstorming seem outlandish/crazy, which
are appealing, and who'd like to be involved.
Among users and potential contri
Hi all!
First, I do not really know enough about release workflow I guess to
know what -release@ does not want to do for kfreebsd apart from stamping
it as an official release so some of my whishes may be totally
reasonable or way of -- please tell me!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Andreas Barth
retitle 63 zeromq: tests fail on kfreebsd
severity 63 wishlist
thanks
Hi Gianluca,
Gianluca Bonetti wrote:
> I can confirm that zeromq_2.2.0+dfsg-6 builds cleanly on up to date Jessie.
Many thanks for checking this and supplying a build log. We can see
in it though that the tests still
On 10 November 2014 00:15:36 CET, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> We discussed kfreebsd at length, but are not satisfied that a
>> release with Jessie will be of sufficient quality. We are dropping
>> it as an official release architecture,
Hi, long time lurker and closet
Christoph Egger wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain writes:
> >> > But certainly for unofficial releases, a supplemental repository would
> >> > be great for us. We can bypass usual freeze policy to fix bugs we think
> >> > are important, which may not have got an unblock.
>
> I guess we need that in so
Eirik Schwenke wrote:
> Finally, allow me to express my gratitude to everyone, both the release team
> and the kfreebsd team, for all the hard work!
Thank you too! For pretty much perfectly summarising my own thoughts
with your mail. Especially the significance of the decision on the
distro bey
Sorry, actually meant to take -release@ out of Cc: for that mail.
Please follow up to -bsd@ if you have comments on it. Thanks.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
15 matches
Mail list logo
