* Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org) [141110 23:10]: > Petr Salinger wrote: > > >Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > >>[...] though we do hope that the > > >>porters will be able to make a simultaneous unofficial release. > > > > It is unclear, what we have to duplicate. Do we stay in testing ? > > I'd like to know this as soon as possible as it affects our planning. > Thanks. > > If we don't stay in testing, we'd at least want to archive off the > last-built kfreebsd packages before they are deleted...
That sounds sensible. As you want to do an unofficial release, I think we should coordinate so that this doesn't create unnecessary additional efforts. I don't know how the others feel about, when should kbsd be removed from testing? That would give some impression how fast this should be done. > But certainly for unofficial releases, a supplemental repository would > be great for us. We can bypass usual freeze policy to fix bugs we think > are important, which may not have got an unblock. I'd replace that with "that allows to have an freeze policy centered around kbsd". Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141110222309.ge...@mails.so.argh.org
