Hi Robert,
On 19.12.2013 01:40, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 18/12/2013 23:48, Robert Millan wrote:
>> I believe the attached patch should fix this, provided that your kernel is
>> not affected by #684595 (i.e. use kfreebsd-11 or kfreebsd-downloader).
>
> Erm, sorry. What I meant to say is that for
On 19/12/2013 04:21, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 18 December 2013 19:58, Robert Millan wrote:
>>
>> We could also try making it play nice with VTs. Maybe enabling
>> newcons helps. Also, there's some disabled WIP code in radeonkms
>> which is aimed at this purpose (I haven't tested it).
>
> Restoring vt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 732617 ufsutils 9.2-3
Bug #732617 [grub, apt, dpkg] Latest updates render Debian GNU/kfreebsd unusable
Bug reassigned from package 'grub, apt, dpkg' to 'ufsutils'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #732617 to the same values
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:41:43PM +0100, Thomas Schweikle wrote:
> It is related to the package "ufsutils_9.2-3_kfreebsd-amd64.deb".
> Installing this one breaks booting the system -- none of the mount
> points are found, even the disk may go haywire.
Please can you explain how did you find
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:41:43PM +0100, Thomas Schweikle wrote:
> It is related to the package "ufsutils_9.2-3_kfreebsd-amd64.deb".
> Installing this one breaks booting the system -- none of the mount
> points are found, even the disk may go haywire.
It would help to see the last message
Since you asked:
the kernel starts OK, but none of the partitions given in /etc/fstab
gets mounted. None is even listed if you try. The devices /dev/da0xx
are just missing."
I've did a lot of testing now and found that all packages available
for "apt-get upgrade" can be installed, but you have to
You may install all packages, except
"freebsd-utils_9.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb". Installing this one renders
the system unusable. Looks like this is a problem with installed udev
rules.
--
Thomas
<>
On 19/12/2013 11:26, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Newcons plus i915kms sounds like an interesting idea. Please feel free
> to ping me for further testing. I'm also subscribed to debian-bsd now.
It's in 11.0~svn259528-2 if you want to try.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-re
kfreebsd-11_11.0~svn259528-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kfreebsd-11_11.0~svn259528-2.dsc
kfreebsd-11_11.0~svn259528-2.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-source-11.0_11.0~svn259528-2_all.deb
kfreebsd-headers-11.0-0_11.0~svn259528-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:20:51 +0100
Source: kfreebsd-11
Binary: kfreebsd-source-11.0 kfreebsd-headers-11.0-0
kfreebsd-image-11.0-0-amd64 kfreebsd-image-11-amd64
kfreebsd-headers-11.0-0-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-11-amd64
kerne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:06:19 +0100
Source: partman-zfs
Binary: partman-zfs
Architecture: source kfreebsd-i386
Version: 31
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian Perrier
Descript
On 19/12/13 16:29, Thomas Schweikle wrote:
> the kernel starts OK, but none of the partitions given in /etc/fstab
> gets mounted
The problem seems to be in the early initscripts then.
Are you able to see/edit the /etc/fstab somehow? Perhaps from the
debian-installer shell:
https://wiki.debian.or
On 19 December 2013 06:33, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 19/12/2013 04:21, Ed Maste wrote:
>> On 18 December 2013 19:58, Robert Millan wrote:
>>>
>>> We could also try making it play nice with VTs. Maybe enabling
>>> newcons helps. Also, there's some disabled WIP code in radeonkms
>>> which is aimed
Em 2013-12-15 15:34, Steven Chamberlain escreveu:
On 15/12/13 04:22, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Yeah, that's unnecessary.
The program is ported now. What do you wnat? The patch or the package?
Did you patch some existing packaging to produce this? In that case a
debdiff may be ideal.
14 matches
Mail list logo
