On 19 December 2013 06:33, Robert Millan <r...@debian.org> wrote: > On 19/12/2013 04:21, Ed Maste wrote: >> On 18 December 2013 19:58, Robert Millan <r...@debian.org> wrote: >>> >>> We could also try making it play nice with VTs. Maybe enabling >>> newcons helps. Also, there's some disabled WIP code in radeonkms >>> which is aimed at this purpose (I haven't tested it). >> >> Restoring vty switching is one of the benefits that Newcons brings - I >> would go ahead and enable it, and use i915kms.ko. > > Uhm not available in releng/10.0 :-( > > Do you think it's safe to backport this? If we put it in our kfreebsd-10 > package, we might be unable to keep it in sync with recent Newcons from > HEAD later on. > > Is it planned for MFC to stable/10 after 10.0 is released?
Yes. There will be some additional development on Newcons in HEAD still, but I expect to see it MFC'd (along with upcoming improvements) to stable/10 as soon as feasible. -Ed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/capyfy2ct2csyvmsvwmxbw0ylyh0osw-6igachnapbfhvclu...@mail.gmail.com
