Hi,
Now that upstream have fixed the sysret patch for RELENG_8_1, I've
committed this as r4320 and we should be ready now for an upload to
stable-sec.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
md64/trap.c?revision=236953&view=markup#l965
The response from upstream so far is that the commit they made to
RELENG_8_1 was indeed wrong. They haven't fixed it yet, but I think it
will end up something like what I've committed in r4319:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/glibc-bsd/
On 16/06/12 18:24, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Author: stevenc-guest
> Date: 2012-06-16 17:24:56 + (Sat, 16 Jun 2012)
> New Revision: 4316
>
> Added:
> branches/squeeze/kfreebsd-8/debian/patches/SA-12_04.sysret.patch
> Modified:
>branches/squeeze/kfr
2011/7/11 Petr Salinger :
> Backport of if_msk seems be the right way from my POV.
> I would just use backport from current 8-STABLE
>
> svn diff http://svn.freebsd.org/base/release/8.1.0/sys/dev/msk
> http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/sys/dev/msk
Ack.
> Are you able to test it on real HW ?
Y
I think people can install from backports if they want the special
features in PF, PFSYNC, CARP and QUOTA, but if_msk causes kernel panic
on first boot. It looks like a big showstopper to me.
If backporting the driver from HEAD is not acceptable, we could
consider other options, like removing th
2011/7/11 Petr Salinger :
>> What kind of updates should be provided for the kfreebsd-8 that
>> shipped with squeeze?
>>
>> Should it stay with 8.1 or should we update it to 8.2?
>
> In squeeze, we should stay with 8.1.
Agreed (but I wanted to ask anyway).
>> If we stay with 8.1, should we enable
2011/7/11 Benjamin Kaduk :
>> Dragging 8.2 userland with it would be a bad idea IMHO. What do you
>> think?
>
> Why do you think it would be a bad idea? Just for the churn factor, or are
> there other expectations of stability?
Yes, different expectations. A Debian stable release usually doesn'
What kind of updates should be provided for the kfreebsd-8 that
shipped with squeeze?
Should it stay with 8.1 or should we update it to 8.2?
In squeeze, we should stay with 8.1.
The kfreebsd-kernel-headers package is generated from 8.1 sources.
Unfortunately, even API is changed between them,
s
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011, Robert Millan wrote:
What kind of updates should be provided for the kfreebsd-8 that
shipped with squeeze?
Should it stay with 8.1 or should we update it to 8.2?
If we update it to 8.2, will this cause trouble with 8.1 userland?
There are strong expectations in the FreeB
What kind of updates should be provided for the kfreebsd-8 that
shipped with squeeze?
Should it stay with 8.1 or should we update it to 8.2?
If we update it to 8.2, will this cause trouble with 8.1 userland?
Dragging 8.2 userland with it would be a bad idea IMHO. What do you
think?
If we stay w
10 matches
Mail list logo
