2011/7/11 Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu>: >> Dragging 8.2 userland with it would be a bad idea IMHO. What do you >> think? > > Why do you think it would be a bad idea? Just for the churn factor, or are > there other expectations of stability?
Yes, different expectations. A Debian stable release usually doesn't update anything except security fixes or critical bugs. However, Debian GNU/kFreeBSD has a special "technology preview" status, that's why I was asking. I agree with Petr it's better to use backports, this give users more choices (stay with 8.1 vs install 8.2 backport). -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxmcaglgniek51x4_3wc6zd25ywkrwxbeagsptlnv48...@mail.gmail.com
