On 2 Apr 2020, at 17:28, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hello, Jess,
>
> Jessica Clarke wrote:
>> I suspect you're falling afoul of the fact that, although I made the orig
>> tarball reproducible [...]
>
> Actually, in this case, I did change the contents of the tarball. I
> believe I should have
Hello, Jess,
Jessica Clarke wrote:
> I suspect you're falling afoul of the fact that, although I made the orig
> tarball reproducible [...]
Actually, in this case, I did change the contents of the tarball. I
believe I should have changed the source version as well. I think
convention is to add
I suspect you're falling afoul of the fact that, although I made the orig
tarball reproducible, the first 10.3~svn300087 was uploaded many years ago and
did not have any reproducibility, so *that* version cannot easily be reproduced
and should instead just be fetched from the archive. This problem
kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn300087-7.dsc: Invalid size hash for
kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn300087.orig.tar.xz:
According to the control file the size hash should be 32165032,
but kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn300087.orig.tar.xz has 31276148.
If you did not include kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn300087.orig.tar.xz in your upload,
4 matches
Mail list logo
