Hello,
On 01/04/14 08:16, Jan Henke wrote:
> after the recent discussions about FTBFS due to gcj, I would like to
> discuss the future of gcj in general here. The thread at [1] brings it
> pretty much to the point I think, while gcj will not go away, there is
> basically no further development to
Hi folks,
after the recent discussions about FTBFS due to gcj, I would like to
discuss the future of gcj in general here. The thread at [1] brings it
pretty much to the point I think, while gcj will not go away, there is
basically no further development to be expected upstream. Together with
the (
2 matches
Mail list logo
