On (07/02/03 11:56), Joel Baker wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 04:12:37PM +, Matthew Rose wrote:
> > On (22/10/02 15:44), Joel Baker wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:39:21PM +0100, John Ineson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:07:42PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > [...]
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 04:12:37PM +, Matthew Rose wrote:
> On (22/10/02 15:44), Joel Baker wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:39:21PM +0100, John Ineson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:07:42PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > Oh, and mentions of patch locations aren
On (22/10/02 15:44), Joel Baker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:39:21PM +0100, John Ineson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:07:42PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Oh, and mentions of patch locations aren't ideal now. Joel's got rather a
> > > lot of cleaner ones in his CVS t
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:39:21PM +0100, John Ineson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:07:42PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> [...]
> > Oh, and mentions of patch locations aren't ideal now. Joel's got rather a
> > lot of cleaner ones in his CVS tree,
>
> Where do I find that? I can't see any r
At present, dpkg won't build because it can't find obstack.h, which
seems to be part of glibc. Is there a patch for dpkg that I need?
isn't obstack part of libiberty?
it appears to be from my netbsd toolchain tree.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:07:42PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
[...]
> Oh, and mentions of patch locations aren't ideal now. Joel's got rather a
> lot of cleaner ones in his CVS tree,
Where do I find that? I can't see any reference to it in the list
archives.
At present, dpkg won't build becaus
Clearly, I should document the process I recently went through to bootstrap
a chroot from zero. I'll try to write something up soon, maybe after I
finish banging on the libc12 package.
--
***
Joel Baker
John Ineson wrote:
> Hi everyone,
Hi,
> I have a Sun IPC here that is running NetBSD and yearning for some good
> Debian lovin'. I know that other people have expressed an interest in
> extending the port to Sparc, so where do we start? Matthew -- did you
> ever write those notes you mentioned l
ld be your GNU config triple followed by your Debian
architecture (so probably netbsd-sparc for the sparc port). You also want
to modify dpkg-architecture (it's in the scripts directory, IIRC) in much
the same way. dpkg is likely to complain about being unable to determine
the architecture from
Hi everyone,
I have a Sun IPC here that is running NetBSD and yearning for some good
Debian lovin'. I know that other people have expressed an interest in
extending the port to Sparc, so where do we start? Matthew -- did you
ever write those notes you mentioned last month?
--
John Ineson
``It's
10 matches
Mail list logo