On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 04:12:37PM +0000, Matthew Rose wrote: > On (22/10/02 15:44), Joel Baker wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:39:21PM +0100, John Ineson wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:07:42PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Oh, and mentions of patch locations aren't ideal now. Joel's got rather > > > > a > > > > lot of cleaner ones in his CVS tree, > > > > > > Where do I find that? I can't see any reference to it in the list > > > archives. > > > > > > At present, dpkg won't build because it can't find obstack.h, which > > > seems to be part of glibc. Is there a patch for dpkg that I need? > > > > Er. I should probably put it up, shouldn't I? Fixed, and linked from > > http://debian-bsd.lightbearer.com/ > > I'm having trouble reading > http://debian-bsd.lightbearer.com/Debian-NetBSD/patches/dpkg > Is the patch elsewhere?
This has been fixed. Permission stupidity on my part, sorry. > Does bsd libc include an obstack equivalent? Hrm. Not sure. I can look, but I see no 'man obstack'; is there a reference for what I should be looking for? -- Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpp2RMX0hCud.pgp
Description: PGP signature
