On 05/12/2013 02:14, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> The radeonkms kernel module was not (auto)loaded.
That's because we lack kldxref / linker.hints. I don't have time atm
but I'll probably get those added later today or maybe tomorrow.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ
On 05/12/2013 02:14, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Maybe that means users without the non-free microcode or with
> unsupported cards, lose functionality (I'll need to do more testing
> to find out the extent of this). But at least it falls back to vesa,
> something that works.
Actually, I just noti
On 00:49, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 05/12/2013 00:08, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > I reverted to unpatched libdrm2/2.4.49-2, and so on boot when lightdm
> > started, Xorg detects no modesetting and it falls back automatically to
> > the vesa driver. (Seemed quite fast and usable, actually).
>
>
On 05/12/2013 00:08, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I reverted to unpatched libdrm2/2.4.49-2, and so on boot when lightdm
> started, Xorg detects no modesetting and it falls back automatically to
> the vesa driver. (Seemed quite fast and usable, actually).
Why vesa?
> This is exactly the kind of fa
On 19:53, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 04/12/2013 10:49, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Most likely has to do with -DWITHOUT_SOURCELESS option in debian/rules,
> > which removes the non-free firmware.
It wouldn't work at all without the microcode. I'd copied it already
into the appropriate /lib/modules/*/
On 04/12/2013 02:39, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Yes, that works, thanks!
Excellent! If we can sort out the other problems you mention,
I can try to get this into 10.0.
> With Debian svn258623-1 and your patch implementing the sysctl,
> firmware modules available, and whether libdrm2 hack is used
On 22:15, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 03/12/2013 14:24, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > This is probably why Konstantin's sysctl checks are a good idea, and
> > the radeonkms module should try to implement them. Otherwise, there's
> > no proper fallback.,
>
> Well, this was simpler than I thought.
>
On 03/12/2013 14:24, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> This is probably why Konstantin's sysctl checks are a good idea, and
> the radeonkms module should try to implement them. Otherwise, there's
> no proper fallback.,
Well, this was simpler than I thought.
Please can you test?
--
Robert Millan
Inde
On 11:22, Robert Millan wrote:
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati/files/extra-src__radeon_kms.c?revision=328711&view=markup
>
> Do you have any devices with these names? It's strange it worked for you
> without this patch.
I had that patch applied too. Without it,
9 matches
Mail list logo
