On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 05:58:24PM -0700, Anant Kabra wrote:
> According to the Apple FAQ
>
> http://www.publicsource.apple.com/ps-faq.html
>
> the apple license is conformant to the OpenSource
> definition guidelines (which is pretty much identical
> to the DFSG)
>
> http://www.opensource.org/o
Scripsit Brent Fulgham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm not sure. As I recall there might have been an issue
> related to notifications (under Section 2.2 You May Deploy
> Covered Code, provided...
> c) if You Deploy Covered Code containing Modifications made
> by You, inform others of how to obtain
According to the Apple FAQ
http://www.publicsource.apple.com/ps-faq.html
the apple license is conformant to the OpenSource
definition guidelines (which is pretty much identical
to the DFSG)
http://www.opensource.org/osd.html
The apple license is here.
http://www.publicsource.apple.com/apsl/
I
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Potter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 2:26 PM
> To: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Musings on Darwin ...
>
>
> I recall waay back on Apr 05 when Brent Fulgham wrote:
>
> > Darwin
I recall waay back on Apr 05 when Brent Fulgham wrote:
> Darwin is now purportedly available for i386 (or rather, it compiles
> under i386 but may not yet quite work).
[...]
I was having similar thoughts myself. The important thing is that Darwin
is a Mach-based microkernel, much like Hurd. I won
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 12:52:33PM -0700, Anant Kabra wrote:
> Whats the license on Darwin? Is it DFSG compatible?
>
> -- Anant
>
Last time I checked it wasn't.
Regards,
Filip
D portions of Darwin are of no
concern.
-Brent
> -Original Message-
> From: Anant Kabra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 12:53 PM
> To: Debian-BSD
> Subject: Re: Musings on Darwin ...
>
>
> Whats the license on Darwin? Is it DFSG comp
Whats the license on Darwin? Is it DFSG compatible?
-- Anant
--- Brent Fulgham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Darwin is now purportedly available for i386 (or
> rather, it compiles
> under i386 but may not yet quite work).
>
> Hmmm.
>
> Darwin also uses the Debian packaging system.
>
> Hmmm.
>
Darwin is now purportedly available for i386 (or rather, it compiles
under i386 but may not yet quite work).
Hmmm.
Darwin also uses the Debian packaging system.
Hmmm.
Darwin is based on FreeBSD and NetBSD.
Hmmm.
Darwin is based on Mach, which is also part of our Hurd Port.
Hmmm.
Perhaps we
9 matches
Mail list logo
