I recall waay back on Apr 05 when Brent Fulgham wrote: > Darwin is now purportedly available for i386 (or rather, it compiles > under i386 but may not yet quite work). [...]
I was having similar thoughts myself. The important thing is that Darwin is a Mach-based microkernel, much like Hurd. I wonder if the two sets of developers couldn't cooperate on a number of things. It would be yet another non-Linux port. But it is also fairly interesting, because there is the possibility of fat binary packages (i.e., it ALL goes in -all). Does anyone know anything else about the availability of an i386 version? -- The number of licorice gumballs you get out of a gumball machine increases in direct proportion to how much you hate licorice.
