On 29/08/2013 11:58, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> For wheezy, we're considering a backport of kfreebsd 9.1. For this
>> version, we could do with clang-3.1 which is what upstream used for
>> that release. Is there any chance we can have clang-3.1 in
>> wheezy/updates (or wheezy/backports)?
> This vers
Hello
First, I am really sorry for the lag about this message. I missed it :/
On 24/06/2013 16:32, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2013/6/23 Sylvestre Ledru :
>>> I would like to ask which versions of clang are expected to be released
>>> with jessie?
>> Clearly, I cannot exactly answer to that question.
2013/6/23 Sylvestre Ledru :
>> I would like to ask which versions of clang are expected to be released
>> with jessie?
> Clearly, I cannot exactly answer to that question.
> For now, there are two releases per year.
> 3.3 just been released. A basic (and probably wrong) estimate could be
> 3.7 [1].
On 23/06/2013 17:13, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi to the Debian Clang maintainer[s].
>
> We are weighing up using GCC vs. Clang for the kFreeBSD 9.1 and later
> kernels for jessie, and possibly also for wheezy-backports.
Excellent news!
> I would like to ask which versions of clang are expected
Hi to the Debian Clang maintainer[s].
We are weighing up using GCC vs. Clang for the kFreeBSD 9.1 and later
kernels for jessie, and possibly also for wheezy-backports.
I would like to ask which versions of clang are expected to be released
with jessie?
Also, is there a possibility of clang-3.2 o
5 matches
Mail list logo
