On 29/08/2013 11:58, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> For wheezy, we're considering a backport of kfreebsd 9.1. For this >> version, we could do with clang-3.1 which is what upstream used for >> that release. Is there any chance we can have clang-3.1 in >> wheezy/updates (or wheezy/backports)? > This version is starting to pretty old... :/
I think it's doubtful we'll have a 9.1 backport at this point, given that we fast-tracked 9.2 in sid/jessie already. Steven et al: I guess we'll have to revisit this later? 9.2 backport maybe? >> It is possible to obtain a commitment from you to provide whichever >> version of clang FreeBSD uses for the latest 9.x release at any given >> time? This would basically just imply not removing certain versions >> until FreeBSD has moved on to the next one. > I am not sure to be able to commit to such things for now unfortunately. > As you can imagine, the llvm-toolchain packages are big packages which > can be tricky to maintain... > > Anyway, I will keep in mind your needs and I propose you contact me > again once you know what you need (and I will try not skipping your > email :p) What is certain right now is that clang-3.2 won't be needed for jessie: Our lowest release candidate is 9.2, which in upstream includes clang-3.3 already. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/521f4613.3090...@debian.org
