2013/8/2 Steven Chamberlain :
> [Robert - not sure if you saw my last mail, but a new upload of
> freebsd-utils should not be needed now.]
Hi Steven,
Yes, I've seen it. Unfortunately I had already uploaded by then. Sorry :-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On 15:26, Petr Salinger wrote:
> [...]
> uploaded 9.1-4 have been built against version 2.17-91 of eglibc,
> with fbtl switch. It will not migrate without eglibc.
>
> Would be possible to bin-nmu freebsd-utils under kfreebsd-amd64,
> given buildd still uses eglibc 2.17-7 ?
I suspect only the rele
[Robert - not sure if you saw my last mail, but a new upload of
freebsd-utils should not be needed now.]
On 02/08/13 22:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 21:59 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/718490
>
> Essentially, the BTS status file generated at 18:0
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 21:59:01 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> [Cc'ing release team as I have a couple of questions]
>
> On 02/08/13 21:47, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Meh, looks like something went wrong with the BTS. Not sure what, but
> > it turns out 9.1-2 migrated to testing today, despite
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 21:59 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 02/08/13 21:47, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Meh, looks like something went wrong with the BTS. Not sure what, but
> > it turns out 9.1-2 migrated to testing today, despite having RC bugs
> > in it :-(
>
> Yes that's odd, freebsd-utils/
[Cc'ing release team as I have a couple of questions]
On 02/08/13 21:47, Robert Millan wrote:
> Meh, looks like something went wrong with the BTS. Not sure what, but
> it turns out 9.1-2 migrated to testing today, despite having RC bugs
> in it :-(
Yes that's odd, freebsd-utils/9.1-2 was specific
Meh, looks like something went wrong with the BTS. Not sure what, but
it turns out 9.1-2 migrated to testing today, despite having RC bugs
in it :-(
I'll prepare a new upload with higher urgency...
2013/8/2 Robert Millan :
> Version: 9.1-3
>
> Thanks!
>
> 2013/8/2 Lars Lansink :
>> Confirmed, it
Confirmed, it works now.
PS I just noticed I wrote Jessie but I am of corse running a Sid system,
but seems we all understood that anyway :)
On Aug 1, 2013 9:52 PM, "Robert Millan" wrote:
> severity 718490 grave
> thanks
>
> 2013/8/1 Lars Lansink :
> > When I started building the package again
severity 718490 grave
thanks
2013/8/1 Lars Lansink :
> When I started building the package again and it seems that quite a few
> files unde sbin/ifconfig/ is missing netinet/ether.h.
>
> sbin/ifconfig/ifbridge.c
> sbin/ifconfig/ifieee80211.c
> sbin/ifconfig/af_link.c
Yes, associated fixes were n
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 718490 grave
Bug #718490 [freebsd-net-tools] freebsd-net-tools: ifconfig segfaults on Jessie
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
718490: http://bugs.debia
Do correct me if I am doing it wrong now but after reading Robert's mail I
uncommented the -Werror... in debian/rules.
When I started building the package again and it seems that quite a few
files unde sbin/ifconfig/ is missing netinet/ether.h.
sbin/ifconfig/ifbridge.c
sbin/ifconfig/ifieee80211.
2013/8/1 Lars Lansink :
> # ifconfig
> nfe0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu
> 1500
> options=82008
> Segmentation fault
Probably my mistake. It might be due to some of the implicit function
declarations coming back during upgrade.
-Werror=implicit-function-declar
Package: freebsd-net-tools
Version: 9.1-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
After upgrade to Jessie ifconfig started to segfault.
/sbin/ifconfig segfaults when given no options or just interface as option.
You can however perform options like
# ifconfig vlan20 create
13 matches
Mail list logo
