On 15:26, Petr Salinger wrote: > [...] > uploaded 9.1-4 have been built against version 2.17-91 of eglibc, > with fbtl switch. It will not migrate without eglibc. > > Would be possible to bin-nmu freebsd-utils under kfreebsd-amd64, > given buildd still uses eglibc 2.17-7 ?
I suspect only the release team can do that. I'm not sure that Christoph can schedule a giveback for a package already 'built'. BTW I was wondering if binary uploads of packages are a good idea or necessary? Historically I think they were a way to avoid unnecessary work for the buildds, whereas the DD would already have built+tested binary packages on at least one arch. That's less relevant for us with powerful buildds and the packages must build on many ports now anyway. But it's sometimes awkward to not have a log from the build; buildd log checks or other QA can also not run in that case. And occasionally mistakes happen when someone's build environment differs from the buildds. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130803152158.ga9...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
