Le 24/03/2013 13:22, Baptiste a écrit :
> Attached is the corrected patch.
Thanks, applied with some minor (not-)linux tweaks instead of the
hard-coded architecture lists. There was not much feedback from -bsd,
but I believe it’s better to start building the kFreeBSD-* RN right now
if we intend t
Le 24/03/2013 13:22, Baptiste a écrit :
> David Prévot a écrit
>>> arch="alpha;amd64;armel;armhf;i386;ia64;mips;mipsel;powerpc;sparc;s390;s390x">
>>
>> I would be much more comfortable if we could use a syntax à la
>>
>>
Actually, arch="not-kfreebsd-i386;not-kfreebsd-amd64" should have wor
David Prévot a écrit
>> +
>
>I guess this was meant to be “kfreebsd-amd64” instead of “amd64”.
Yes, right. So happy to build something that I didn't check this !
Attached is the corrected patch.
>> -
>> +> arch="alpha;amd64;armel;armhf;i386;ia64;mips;mipsel;powerpc;sparc;s390;s390x">
>
> I would
David Prévot writes:
>> -
>> +> arch="alpha;amd64;armel;armhf;i386;ia64;mips;mipsel;powerpc;sparc;s390;s390x">
>
> I would be much more comfortable if we could use a syntax à la
>
>
>
> because the hardcoded list of non-kfreebsd will bite us as soon as we’ll
> add a new Linux architecture.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 23/03/2013 12:10, Baptiste a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 patch
Thanks Baptiste for working on this issue.
> +
I guess this was meant to be “kfreebsd-amd64” instead of “amd64”.
> -
> + arch="alpha;amd64;armel;armhf;i386;ia64;mips;mipsel;pow
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi maintainers,
> Please find attached a *kind* of patch to apply on 3 files :
> - release-notes/release-notes.ent
> - release-notes/en/issues.dbk
> - release-notes/en/upgrading.dbk
I'm updating the patch because I succesfully built the RN for both
kfreebsd-i386 &
kfreeb
Le Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:36:21 +0100, Julien Cristau
a écrit :
> The release notes need a kfreebsd person looking at them to mark the
> linuxisms and add corresponding info for kfreebsd. If that doesn't
> happen we'll do as in squeeze and just not build for kfreebsd, I
> think.
>
> Cheers,
> Juli
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 19:51:15 +0200, Baptiste wrote:
> Package: release-notes
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> I read the release-notes for kFreeBSD-* and I saw a lot of references to the
> linux kernel and udev. These appears in stable & testing.
> For examples at §4.4.5, §4.5.1 and
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I read the release-notes for kFreeBSD-* and I saw a lot of references to the
linux kernel and udev. These appears in stable & testing.
For examples at §4.4.5, §4.5.1 and §4.6.
Of course, we could be more purist and say we have to remove Lin
9 matches
Mail list logo