David Prévot <taf...@debian.org> writes:
>> -<section id="cryptoloop">
>> +<section id="cryptoloop"
>> arch="alpha;amd64;armel;armhf;i386;ia64;mips;mipsel;powerpc;sparc;s390;s390x">
>
> I would be much more comfortable if we could use a syntax à la
>
> <section id="cryptoloop" noarch="kfreebsd-i386;kfreebsd-amd64">
>
> because the hardcoded list of non-kfreebsd will bite us as soon as we’ll
> add a new Linux architecture. I haven’t yet looked at how hard it will
> be to implement.
A linux-any would be ideal I guess. Handling the hurd and
kfeebsd-$whatever cases fine as well ;-)
Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87hak2hwyq....@mitoraj.siccegge.de
