I think that a clear statement from the kFreeBSD porters about this
would help concluding this debate.
Does anybody have anything to say about this?
I don't think the purpose of your question is concluding the debate, I
think it just tries to enforce your point of view by presenting your
goa
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > >> I think that a clear statement from the kFreeBSD porters about this
> > >> would help concluding this debate.
> > > Does anybody have anything to say about this?
> > I don't think the purpose of your question is concluding the debate, I
> > think it just tries to enforce
On Jul 21, Robert Millan wrote:
> >> A more interesting question is: if systemd or upstart were adopted,
> >> would the kFreeBSD porters be willing to implement everything needed
> >> to support on their ports the packages using a non-traditional init
> >> configuration, in the way they consider
On Jul 20, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> A more interesting question is: if systemd or upstart were adopted,
> would the kFreeBSD porters be willing to implement everything needed
> to support on their ports the packages using a non-traditional init
> configuration, in the way they consider appropriate a
On Jul 20, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Having concluded from this thread that 1) kfreebsd is important to
> Debian and 2) systemd is important for Debian, the question cannot be
I think that both statements are not so much obvious, but anyway...
> which one we choose between the two, but HOW we ac
]] Robert Millan
| 2011/7/18 Tollef Fog Heen :
| > | The main issue I have with dropping kFreeBSD & HURD would be (apart from
| > | losing two platforms I use - even if for fun only; I don't want to use a
| > | distribution that doesn't allow me to have as much fun as I do now) that
| > | it lead
2011/7/18 Tollef Fog Heen :
> | The main issue I have with dropping kFreeBSD & HURD would be (apart from
> | losing two platforms I use - even if for fun only; I don't want to use a
> | distribution that doesn't allow me to have as much fun as I do now) that
> | it leads down the path of dropping w
]] Gergely Nagy
| Federico Di Gregorio writes:
|
| > On 18/07/11 12:13, Samuel Thibault wrote:
| >> Jon Dowland, le Mon 18 Jul 2011 10:35:30 +0100, a écrit :
| >>> 1. carry portability patches against systemd locally
| >>> 2. support multiple init systems
| >>> 3. drop kfreebsd (and HURD and ot
8 matches
Mail list logo
